• What is 5G?
  • New technical features
  • Deployment steps
  • Misinformation
    • Use of very high frequencies
    • The frequency of 60 GHz and oxygen
    • Hundreds of birds killed by 5G
• Health implications
• The usage of orgonites in all of this?
• How to place orgonites and how many?
• What else can be done to protect oneself from artificial waves?

The questions that come up the most are like this:

• What is the best orgonite to protect from 5G?
• Does orgonite work to protect against 5G?
• How to use orgonites for 5G?
• What can we do against 5G?
• etc.

You are invited to take the time to read this page very calmly and in all its length, because as with other complicated subjects, people panic, mix and amalgamate the subjects without even understanding much about the subject. I have already seen the same frenzy pass at the time of the transition from 3G to 4G, people said that it was going to be the end of the world, etc.
For your information, I am neither for 5G, nor against, as in any subject, I find that there is good and bad, what is shocking each time is the panic of some and the frenzy of others, there is never a good middleground to study subjects patiently and in detail. Some humans tend to go headlong in new directions without taking their time, which means that sooner or later the consequences of these impulsive actions have to be faced. At the same time other humans panic at the idea of ​​a change and strongly criticize these advancing people, without really trying to understand the subject. We need to find a good middleground, not to advance too quickly, nor to be resistant to change, unfortunately for the moment this good middleground exists only too rarely in our society.

What is 5G?
5G is an evolution of 4G, it has 3 major technical evolutions that we will discuss without going into too much detail. The deployment of 5G is also planned in two fairly distinct stages which we must also be aware of.

New technical features
The 3 main improvements compared to 4G are: shortened connection “paths” between two communicating devices (reduced latency), multidirectional antennas and higher frequencies.

1. The first improvement is important for the telecommunications network, but in terms of waves it does not change anything. It is a technical evolution of the network which allows a communication to find the shortest path, ie. imagine that you send an SMS to a friend living 100km away, at present your SMS will be received by the antenna connected to your mobile, then the data of the SMS will be propagated towards several other network points (by wired network or aerial) until it arrives at the antenna which will transmit it to your friend’s mobile. The problem with the current technology is that data can pass through lots of useless points (and even very far away) which only lengthen time from one point to another and overload certain parts of the network unnecessarily. Each additional interconnect adds about 5-10 milliseconds more. It’s nothing for a call or a text message, but if it is a matter of controlling a very precise machine from a distance, a reaction time of 10ms or 50ms can make a big difference. With the improvements of the 5G network, data will pass through the shortest paths possible, which will make the network less congested and have less latency/delay. This is important for the vision of connected objects that some technophiles of this world have, the more there will be connected objects the better it will be that the networks are the least congested possible.
2. The second improvement is the use of multidirectional antennas. Currently, a 2G/3G/4G antenna transmits the same signal in all directions, which means that it transmits the signal for your mobile in a lot of unnecessary directions. The antennas provided for 5G work with a principle of “phased array” which allows to orient the signal and there are several dozen mini antennas (even hundreds) per antenna. So a 5G antenna (here we are talking about an entire panel placed on a mast) contains a lot of mini antennas which allows it to transmit specifically in a more precise direction, this saves energy by not transmitting in unnecessary directions and also to use one or more antennas in the same direction to boost the signal when necessary.
3. The third improvement is the use of higher frequencies. Until now the frequencies used by 2G/3G/4G generally did not go beyond 3.5 GHz. With 5G it is planned to use much higher frequencies, especially around 26-28 GHz, but also more widely from 3 GHz to 60 GHz. This is necessary in order to be able to increase the bandwidth of the connection, because at present, being globally limited between 800 MHz (0.8 GHz) and 3.5 GHz, the speed cannot be significantly increased. Because for that it would be necessary to be able to allocate, for example, a single frequency band from 2 GHz to 3 GHz for a single mobile, which will limit the number of other phones that can connect at the same time. From 0.8 GHz to 3.5 GHz, you can make 2 connections of this kind, one from 1 to 2 GHz, the other from 2 to 3 GHz and everything is almost used. Whereas with a much wider frequency band from 3 to 60 GHz, you can allocate 3-4 GHz to one phone, 4-5 to another, 5-6 to another, etc. There is enough to do this for 50 simultaneous connections. With the current frequencies between 0.8 and 3.5 GHz, a connection to a mobile allocates in general around 100 MHz (0.1 GHz), which limits the transfer rate quite significantly.

Deployment steps
Overall there are two quite distinct, right now, in 2020, we are only in the early stages of the first step.

1. The first step of deployment.
   Right now we can say that what is being deployed is 4G+, it is not yet the planned 5G as expected when it will be fully deployed. The telecommunication companies are in the process of deploying the improvements 1 and 2 mentioned above, ie. improve the interconnection network between the transmission antennas to reduce latency times/delays and set up panels with multidirectional mini-antennas.
2. The second stage of deployment is the use of higher frequencies, beyond 3-3.5 GHz.
   It is far from being tested in full-scale, there are still lots of technical problems to solve, mobilephones are still totally not ready, the higher frequency bands are not yet allocated in lots of countries, etc. The panels currently deployed do not yet support these new frequencies.

Misinformation
I therefore allow myself to take a quick tour of the erroneous information that is present on the internet at the moment.

• Use of very high frequencies
  The use of frequencies beyond 5-6 GHz is technically very problematic, for 5G it hasn’t even started. The attributions of these frequencies to the mobile operators are hardly started in a majority of countries in the world and the technical problems associated with the use of these frequencies are multiple.
  Do note that high frequencies are already in use since 10-20 years for radio-relay systems, with these drums that everyone can observe at the top of large telecommunications masts.
  
  They can use frequencies between 0 and 80 GHz.
  These drums are used to propagate a signal in a straight line, in front of one of these drums, at 5, 10, 20, 50km there must necessarily be another drum opposite perfectly positioned for communication to take place. These drums are used to avoid digging trenches and pulling cables from one antenna to another. It would be really better if they pulled cables to avoid having all these extra waves… Just know that they have been around for a long time and that high frequencies are already used.
  These drums are even already used in cities for communications from one building to another for certain companies, in a straight line in very high floors where there is no obstacle between two buildings.
  Orgonites have already shown their effects thousands of times with these drums, so we also know that they are ready for the massive arrival of these high frequencies in the urban world. Even if once again, I am not very happy with these technological developments made without paying much attention to the health impacts.
  Very high frequencies cannot generally be easily used in a dense urban environment, that’s why there are still a lot of technical problems to be resolved for the real 5G as it is imagined. High frequencies, beyond 5-10 GHz, penetrate very badly through buildings, human bodies and any other obstacle. You need free air, windows, paper/plastic and nothing else. It will always be the lowest frequencies that will be used to make connections through denser walls and materials. So to receive 5G at 1Gbps in an apartment it will be necessary to have a 5G antenna in a straight line somewhere not far away and which passes through the window, the use of these high frequencies will be completely impossible if there is a wall in the path. This is why the principle of very precise multidirectional antennas is important. These antennas must detect when it is possible to use such or such frequency towards a telephone, based on the obstacles which are between the antenna and this mobile.
  It is also why it is true that there will probably be a frenzy to cut trees and other obstacles in the environment to allow 5G to pass and why antennas will be needed everywhere. Because it must also be understood that the high frequencies of microwaves cannot emit very far, the signals at 60 GHz for example cannot emit a well detectable signal further than 1-2km (on the contrary a signal of 800 MHz/0.8 GHz can easily be received several tens of kilometers away, this is why television by antenna uses frequencies between 500 and 800 MHz).
  That said, at the moment there has been a lot of false information about trees that have been cut in cities and where it has been blamed on 5G, when it was always for reasons of urban planning, too old trees, reconstruction of an avenue, etc. even if sometimes these actions are sometimes still absurd. At present, in 2020, this is useless because no equipment deployed on a large scale in an urban environment emits at those frequencies, but it is good to remain vigilant on this aspect. If one day it will really be necessary to cut a lot of trees everywhere to allow for the arrival of 5G at very high speed, this will probably not be done so easily and will even be an obstacle to an all-out use of 5G, because it will really have to disfigure our environment. But it will also be necessary to construct buildings with walls made of materials other than concrete, the use of frequencies above 10 GHz in a dense urban environment is a real headache. Just as the use of these high frequencies in a sparse rural environment, because it will take a lot of antennas close to each house to serve signals at 10-30 GHz, this is simply absurd and economically unsustainable. Burying fiber optic cables will be much cheaper.

• The frequency of 60 GHz and oxygen
  There is a lot of false information on this subject right now too.
  The frequency of 60 GHz corresponds to lines of absorption of oxygen and water vapor, so the weakening of radio waves at these frequencies is very important. Put more simply, water vapor and oxygen greatly block the passage of signals at frequencies of 60 GHz, which means that these frequencies have not been allocated historically, more precisely the band of 57-64 GHz, because nobody considered them interesting. Nowadays, imagining a wifi router just for a room is possible, even sometimes preferable because it prevents the signal from going out of the room, which is a good measure of security. So the 60 GHz frequencies are starting to interest the industry, for people/objects detection/counting radars too. Since these frequencies were not attractive at one time, there is no license to use these frequencies today in most countries, which makes them very attractive. Otherwise one has to pay dearly to create devices using such or such frequencies.
  These frequencies, due to their technical characteristics have advantages of non-interference between them, because they only go in the desired direction, for any other direction, since oxygen and water vapor absorb them, they do not spread.
  There is already, since around 2013, a WiFi standard (IEEE802.11ad) called WiGig using frequencies at 60 GHz to offer theoretical speeds of 2GBps, but it is the industry that is trying to go too fast. Because in practical use few people manage to get a better speed than WiFi in 2-5 GHz. These extraordinary speeds only work a few meters from the router and very badly. Yet these WiGig routers began to be marketed in 2016, in 4 years of existence this technology is still almost unusable in the real world.
  We can already see the limits of the absurd use of these high frequencies. There is sensational publicity for real results that are actually completely unusable.
  Even in a very narrow straight line, as explained above for the drums, these very high frequencies only work for distances of 1-2km, drums which transmit at 10, 20, 50km use much lower frequencies. At the moment there are no wireless technology capable of competing with the transfer rates of fiber optics.
  There are already 60 GHz drums used for urban communications of less than 1-1.5 km, but for these drums to work they must be placed in areas where there is absolutely no obstacle between them, otherwise they cannot work. They are generally used in high places in large cities to pass a signal from one building to another not too far away.
• Hundreds of birds killed by 5G
  These types of stories were already widespread for the transition from 3G to 4G too, there is none that has been proven true over time, there are cases where there is no answer. But for example, a recent case about dead birds in the Netherlands at the Hague in the Huijgenspark in 2020 or at the end of 2019 for the 5G test. However it turns out that this mass death took place in October 2018 for partially understandable reasons (dead birds with bruises, due to high speed shocks).
  https://www.hetnatuurhistorisch.nl/nieuws/vijftien-dode-spreeuwen-uit-den-haag

  Or this photo, which was massively shared about a 5G bird slaughter.
  
  This photo is real, that being said the death of these birds is due to a storm in Rome which brought down a tree which brought tons of birds with it, the death of the birds is really located around this tree.
  
  https://www.leggo.it/italia/roma/roma_albero_umberto_ospedale_uccelli_morti_ultime_notizie_foto-5028939.html

The frequencies used today have not changed much. The connection of the mobile panels/antennas, as in the photo below, shows it.

The connexions of these antennas have always been very similar for years, the frequencies are always between 0.8 GHz and 3-3.5 GHz. Since the era of 2G…

base-station-antennas/

5G antennas can actually use higher frequencies, but for the moment it is generally limited to 6 GHz.

base-station-antennas/itemnnv4ssp-360s-f4/

Health implications
Having explained all the broad outlines of the subject, in these technical details, I must approach the health aspect, but calmly.
It was necessary to straighten out the subject, dead birds in droves, 60 GHz, breathing difficulties due to the Coronavirus (Covid-19) and many other aberrations published on social networks are just false.
I understand the panic of many people who are afraid of health repercussions, large-scale tracking, overuse of technology, etc. But this panic also makes people believe in a lot of things that only amplify the panic, when they are false.

That is not to say that the deployment of 5G should be taken lightly. I am personally generally against it, but I also see some good things in it, unfortunately they come linked with many bad aspects!
For example, the principle of very precise multidirectional antennas is really a principle which makes sense, the antennas would no longer emit unnecessarily in unwanted directions. But on the other hand there is no limit for the moment to how many antennas could transmit towards a mobile, a person could be somewhere with 8 antennas transmitting towards it.
The principle of energy saving is also useful.
The principle of having faster connections (especially response time) is also useful and this evolution has nothing to do with changes in the radiowaves.
On the other hand, the use of very high frequencies when it is clearly demonstrated that these frequencies are strongly absorbed by living beings is very bad, given how it is developing at present. Because from a purely theoretical point of view, normally this would be good, because the antennas should only transmit when the conditions are good, that is to say that there is no obstacle between the antenna and the object to connect to. In this case there is no reason to worry about the direct health effects on an animal/human, since there will be nothing in the way of the waves.
But, in practice, the theory is not applied, we can already see it with manufacturers who have been trying to sell WiFi routers (WiGig) at 60 GHz since around 2016, these routers still do not implement any of the selectivity rules of 5G wave emission, that is, emit only when there is no obstacle. This is what is fundamentally wrong every time, the ideas are good, but they are deployed so quickly that in the end it lacks three quarters of the original idea. Obstacle detection technologies are still in research, it will take time for them to work well, meanwhile manufacturers will most likely already try to deploy 5G without all of what it is supposed to be.

That being said, even if antennas emit at 30-60 Ghz only when there is no obstacle, it still does not take into account the effects of these radiowaves on the environment. They will obviously not have a direct impact on living beings, since they are not supposed to be emitted on a living being, but these waves interact with matter in ways that are still almost not documented. With orgonites we have very striking results of the effects of these waves on a large scale on the climate, even if they are non-ionizing and supposedly harmless, their effects on the climate are clear in certain situations.
In Spain, there are antennas along the whole coast, with drums (radio-relay systems) which relay signals from one antenna to another, a person had placed orgonites at most of these antennas around 2010, on almost 2000 km of the coastline. These antennas clearly created a kind of invisible barrier that prevented rain coming from the Atlantic from entering Spain. Once all these antennas were gifted (orgonites added close) there was much more rain coming from the Atlantic. Before that they were really blocked.
Of course, it would also be necessary to take into account the effects of atmospheric pollutants, which tamper with precipitations or modify the movements of air masses by causing or preventing rainfall, warming/cooling the atmosphere by reflecting the sun or infrared rays, etc. this is still relevant. The subject is very broad.

Non-ionizing waves, even in the open air, have effects that are still largely ignored by science. Thus, since science and industry do not consider these effects, they do not conduct any researches. We continue to deploy technologies whose effects on a large scale are completely unknown.

The effects on living beings do not even need to be mentioned, there are so many studies that are ignored. If 5G was really properly deployed it could help mitigate the effects of the waves by transmitting only in the desired directions and when necessary, but we unfortunately know that private companies are still going too fast and do things always halfway.

Thus, if 5G is deployed without all the technology it is supposed to be, the fact that the waves in the frequencies of 10-60 GHz and more are very absorbed by any obstacle is one of the subjects of most concern for some scientists. Because these frequencies have wavelengths that will make human hair act like antennas, insects with their antennas will pick up these frequencies too, etc. It is undeniable that this will have harmful repercussions on the health of many living beings. Again, as in the past, these effects are subtle and mild in most cases, but accumulated over long periods of time these effects become harmful, like those that are now known with regards to brain tumors that form after heavy use for more than 10 years on the side of the ear which has been very exposed to a mobile phone. At the moment we cannot predict exactly what these new frequencies will do, but it is obvious that they will have deleterious effects.
The effects of high power waves have also been proven for years, some trees placed in front of transmitting antennas have a large part of their foliage which is totally killed.

A study has been done on this subject, the results are clear.
Review: Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants
Our analysis demonstrates that the data from a substantial amount of the studies on RF-EMFs from mobile phones show physiological and/or morphological effects (89.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, our analysis of the results from these reported studies demonstrates that the maize, roselle, pea, fenugreek, duckweeds, tomato, onions and mungbean plants seem to be very sensitive to RF-EMFs. Our findings also suggest that plants seem to be more responsive to certain frequencies, especially the frequencies between (i) 800 and 1500 MHz (p < 0.0001), (ii) 1500 and 2400 MHz (p < 0.0001) and (iii) 3500 and 8000 MHz (p = 0.0161)

Having said that, it should be remembered that you mustn’t believe in everything and anything too quickly, there are also trees that die from prolonged, repeated droughts and empty water tables. With the waves, the trees show signs, often with one part of the tree dead and the other alive, but an antenna will not kill an entire forest.

On the other hand, as explained above, artificial waves have little documented effects on the climate, the accumulation of artificial waves in the environment can very clearly cause disturbances which lead for example to exacerbate droughts and therefore cause the slow death of forests.

Not to mention the SpaceX/Starlink satellites etc. which will further increase the density of artificial waves in the environment.

The potential effects of artificial waves on living beings are well demonstrated by many scientific studies: Scientific publications on the effects of artificial microwaves on living beings

There is another important aspect to take into account on this subject, all artificial electromagnetic waves are polarized. This is the most important difference between natural electromagnetic waves, which have globally random polarizations, and artificial electromagnetic waves, which have fixed polarizations. The density of artificial electromagnetic waves has considerably increased in the human environment since the years 1990-2000, but what makes them have cumulative deleterious effects is their fixed polarization. Because there are lots of natural electromagnetic waves from everywhere, visible light, infrared, UV-A, UV-B, but these natural waves have random polarizations, that way they do not disturb the living world, which has been used to them for millennia.
The proliferation of artificial waves in our environment is clearly a problem that will one day have to be taken into account, because the cumulation of these polarized waves creates interference zones where the power of these waves becomes large enough to induce effects on living cells, at minimal scales of a few tens of millivolts, very locally, therefore difficult to detect by measuring devices. These electrical potentials are sufficient to affect the permeability of the cells and for example disturb the exchange processes of ions of calcium, potassium, sodium, etc. in the human body.
For more details on this subject: What’s orgonite > Polarization

The usage of orgonites in all of this?

So here we are with the recommendations to tell you which orgonites to use, how and why.
First there is this general message on all descriptions of unique orgonites:

General information:
The description is made by a friend sensitive to subtle energies.
This description can not be more precise, just as it is impossible for a psychologist to tell an individual immediately and exactly why he/she has such a concern, nor how long it will take to be settled, nor how it will happen.
What will happen between you and the orgonite will be unique and suited to you and/or the environment.

All orgonites have the same basic effects:

• Neutralize the negative effects of EM fields.
• Energize water, food, minerals, etc.
• Harmonize/neutralize natural faults, such as Curry lines cross, Hartmann, etc.
• Globally strengthen the vitality of all living things: plants, animals, humans.

Each addition (stone, plant, seashell, etc.) has a unique influence that adds itself to this common base, like spices/herbs added to a basic dish.

For a more complete explanation of something that can not be summarized in a few lines, you can visit these links:

• What's orgonite > Technical explanations of orgonite
• What's orgonite > link available when possible (2020-2025)
• What's orgonite > link available when possible (2020-2025)

As also explained in the above section: Health implications, there are already a lot of past results from using orgonites on the climate during giting on a large scale on transmitting antennas. Because these already have drums (relays/radio-relay systems) transmitting at frequencies up to 80 GHz since more than 10-20 years, although in reality these drums most often emit around 5-15 GHz because the higher frequencies don’t go far enough.
Orgonites have already shown their effects on the climate with these antennas many times in the past, you can see it on the Blog which describes some of my own giftings. It is always a very similar effect, when the climatic conditions lend themselves to it, the sky uncovers itself and forms a sort of thinning/circular opening in the clouds above certain antennas and/or areas. It is an effect very similar to that which also occurs sporadically above a Cloudbuster.

Orgonites work on the frequencies of 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, 6G, 7A, 8G, etc. It’s that simple.
As explained above: Deployment steps, when the frequencies will increase, it will also work, even if this evolution is still far from being massively deployed.

Whether for WiFi, 3G, 4G, 5G, 6G, 7G it’s the same, all orgonites work equally well, if someone says somewhere that it requires an evolution of orgonite (to add certain metals , certain stones, certain shapes, etc.), this is simply not true. Any well fabricated orgonite (Basic rules to make orgonites) works very well to neutralize the harmful effects of microwaves for any frequency.
This is explained in more detail here: What’s orgonite > Frequencies with which orgonites can interact
An orgonite works for waves at all frequencies present on our planet! All those that exist and are used today (artificial and natural), but also for all those to come.
This has been the case since the beginning of the existence of orgonites and it will remain so.

It is also good to re-specify, as it is explained in the first box here: What’s orgonite > Properties of materials in orgonite.

Do not expect artificial waves to disappear, orgonites do not work like this, they decrease the harmful effects of these waves on our body, they help living beings to react differently to waves, to be less affected. The sources emitting the waves cannot change, but the orgonites act on the environment and the artificial waves present with, described briefly, two complementary processes:

• They reestablish a greater and more stable equilibrium in the coalescence fractals of the surrounding environment. Which is beneficial for all living things.
• They promote a more random polarization of all waves and therefore artificial waves, when there are enough orgonites distributed fairly homogeneously.

This effect occurs with all types and frequencies of waves, it’s as simple as that.

There is just one type of orgonite on this site which seems to be more effective against the radiowaves than the others, these are the Induction TB.
It is still not clear exactly why, but the feedback from people who are slightly electro-sensitive, or very electro-sensitive, always go in this direction.
It is explained a little here: “Operating Instructions” for orgonites > How many orgonites are required for…?. Feedback from people who did gifting on antennas has often indicated that an Induction TB had as much effect as 2-4 basic TB.

How to place orgonites and how many?
This is explained in a very simple fashion here: “Operating Instructions” for orgonites > Where/how to place/use orgonite?

As a general rule just place the orgonite the closest to where you want the positive effect. If it’s to transmute the electromagnetic waves of a WiFi router, place the orgonite on it, or under, or next to it. If its’ for a plant place the orgonite at the base of the plant. If it’s to purify/energise water or drinking water put the orgonite just next to the bottle/jug etc. If it’s for yourself, just keep it in your pocket or bag or wherever you can keep it, close to your bed or under your bed if you are prone to sleeping problems, it might help, even a lot for some.

To go into more detail, specifically regarding electromagnetic waves, the best thing to do is to have some Induction TB(s) to place near the objects that emit the most, or in the path where the waves come from, if you know it. And a few more basic TB(s) to disperse in or around your home.
Gifting TB(s) do the job very well too, they’re just a little less pretty.

Having orgonites dispersed in a fairly homogeneous way in a house, or around a house, means that the harmful effects of artificial waves coming from outside are generally neutralized. As explained just before, by the two complementary processes. Firstly they restore a greater balance in the coalescence fractals in the close environment, secondly, if distributed everywhere on/in the place, they promote a more random polarization of the artificial waves.

The only concrete observation of these effects which has already been observed many times is in apartments surrounded by several wifi transmitters. Often a person can observe in this environment that there are 10-20 and more wifi networks picked up on a computer or smartphone.
After scattering 10-20 orgonites (TBs) around the apartment, many people observed that all the very weak wifi networks disappeared. This is due to the randomization of polarization that occurs. Polarization is a property of waves that is often forgotten, because everything is done nowadays to capture regardless of the direction of the polarization, with multidirectional reception antennas. But if you observe the transmitting antennas, they are often vertical, to emit a circular field around the antenna; a vertically polarized field.
Most of the artificial waves emitted have a fixed polarization, generally vertical.
The orgonites scattered in a house will pick up and re-emit the waves and randomize the polarization due to the totally random positioning of the metal shavings which pick up/reflect/re-emit (in addition to other subtle effects not measurable with devices today).
As a result, low intensity waves become very difficult to capture as they lose their fixed polarization.
It is also this effect which makes the artificial waves more bearable, a human being can bear waves as already explained above, it is the excess of polarized waves in a fixed way which is harmful. The more the polarizations are random, the more they are bearable by a human body. In nature, electromagnetic waves (at frequencies other than our artificial waves) are almost always randomly polarized except perhaps in certain configurations of places which favor polarization because of fairly ordered reflections.

That said, don’t forget that the more you place orgonites around you the more it increases the vibratory rate of the place, by what is described above as the greater balance of coalescence fractals. Be aware that this can lead to other effects in addition to protecting you from harmful wave effects: Effects of orgonite on living things.
These other effects are very beneficial in the long term, but initially it can sometimes be disturbing. That said, the most frequent initial observation is still very beneficial, better sleep.

What else can be done to protect oneself from artificial waves?
The best solution would be to go out in nature, far from everything… Since it is almost impossible for the majority of people to do this, there are a few general rules which are nevertheless good to follow.

• Keep as far as possible all the sources of waves on which we can act. For example, turn off the WiFi function of routers at home and wire the whole house with Ethernet cables. Deactivate the “mobile data” mode of mobile phones when it is not necessary, activate it only when it is necessary. Even put them in airplane mode. Do not have a cordless landline phone, etc. If you’re not be able to turn off the wave sources during the day, do so at least at night, they really disturb sleep, even if these effects are very subtle and difficult to notice. Because according to many studies, all damage to DNA and cells caused by waves is reversible when they are not too serious, so making sure that we have at least a sleep without exposure to artificial waves is already better than nothing so that our body can regenerate well at night. If you live in an apartment and the waves come from the neighbouring wall, obviously it will probably be hard to motivate this neighbour to change his habits, in that case the best thing to do is to arrange our place to have the places where we stay fixed at home (sofa, desk, etc.) as far as possible from where these waves come.
  It is always the same recommendation, expose yourself as little as possible to the waves and if you cannot avoid it, try to be as far as possible from the source of these waves and/or stay there as little as possible.
• If you are the owner of your home and have the means, a simple and effective method, for life, to remove all the radiation that can come from the electrical network of the house: PLC, pulsed signals of Smart-meters, pulsed signals leaking from the electrical network coming from neighbours, etc. is to install a shielded wiring with earthing. It has to be done only once, it has its cost, but once done, no matter what passes and will pass through the cables, they will never leak any electromagnetic pollution again. It is almost obvious that these cables will one day become the norm for all new constructions.
• The third solution, which is less easy to implement, is to use Faraday cages. This is what is done in the above explanation with shielded cables, these are cables with a complete metal exterior, which has the effect of a Faraday cage. A completely closed metal box prevents any electromagnetic wave from entering or leaving it, this is the effect of a Faraday cage. Some extremely electro-sensitive people are forced to cover all the walls of their housing with metallic paints to transform their place into a Faraday cage. It’s really an extreme version of the subject. If you are not highly electro-sensitive it is not necessarily necessary, there are less complete alternatives, but very useful to protect certain parts of a home. If you cannot for example change the opinion of the neighbours who have many sources of radiowaves in their place, you can find canopies (curtains) for your bed in fine metal mesh, they have their price, but once again, it is a lifetime investment. You can also close it completely by doing the same above and below the bed, to at least have a sleep out of reach of any artificial wave, this is the most important. In a more simplified version, it is also possible to cover for example a door of a room with a metal plate, connected to the earth socket, this will pick up all the waves coming from behind the door and they will not be able to reach you. This is again a good option if you are in an apartment and disturbed by a neighbour’s WiFi, if you know where it is, behind which wall, you can place a 2m x 2m aluminium plate connected to an earth socket, the thinnest plate possible, the thickness is not particularly important. Since waves propagate in a straight line from the source point from which these waves are produced, this plate will almost completely protect you from all the radiation coming from this neighbouring WiFi.
• Lastly, attention must be paid to diet, health, sleep, stress, etc. It is always very important to remember this, because a large majority of scientific studies nevertheless indicate that pulsed artificial waves have very negligible impacts on the human body if they are of low power. When healthy, the human body is normally quite able to withstand these effects. It is obviously even better if it would not have to withstand them, without waves it would clearly be better. It is a general observation that may be made, that highly electrosensitive people are in the vast majority also affected by one or more autoimmune diseases. The question of whether electro-sensitivity caused the weakening of the immune system or whether the weakened immune system caused electro-sensitivity is another question, such as the fact that perhaps there are also genetic predispositions, intoxication of the body with certain heavy metals, etc. It is too long to enter into this debate here, it is just to clarify that I do not denigrate electro-sensitive people, but this observation is often frequent, they have a weakened immune system for reasons sometimes hard to elucidate. For a rather healthy person, having a weakened immune system necessarily makes us more vulnerable, our body is normally very able to resist waves if they are of weak power and that the density of the radiations is not too dense.

This is a re-transcript of the original page available here: http://www.whale.to/b/torsion_cbs.htm
As this is a valuable information, I thought it was useful to keep it safe and also translate it into other languages.
The author of this original forum post in the end of 2005 and creator (I am not sure about the whole history, I’m just re-transcripting) of this torsion Cloudbuster is Laozu.

The basic cloud-buster, and the one I first made, consists of six vertical copper pipes spaced uniformly in a circle, and placed in a cylinder of orgonite, with a quartz crystal at the base of each of the pipes. I buried my first one in the ground, because this gave it better contact with the qi which flows through the ground: a simplified diagram (only four pipes show) is as follows:

After I buried it, I made daily observations of the qi flow into and out of it, and after a month or so, I tried to get some sort of geometrical idea of the qi dispersal, when the CB was working normally. In the following diagram, the qi most strongly influenced by the CB is white and that less strongly influenced is yellow:

Negative qi spiraled down from the sky (counter-clockwise viewed from above) and qi spiraled up from the ground (again counter-clockwise viewed from above). The boundary of the spirals roughly formed a hyperbolid (or hour-glass) shape: this boundary is indicated by purple curves. Where the two spirals came together was where the negative qi was transmuted into positive qi:

If we remove the pipes from the diagram, and place a line tangent to the boundary curves, we get

This suggested to me that I should set the 6 pipes at an angle, somewhat the same as this tangent pipe — the following diagram shows the idea with two pipes:

I did this, and found that the qi moved somewhat as indicated in the following diagram:

Since the positive qi (colored red) swirled upward in the center from where the transmutation took place at the narrow part of the 6-pipe configuration, I added a seventh pipe in the center to help direct it. This worked well, but only when the bottom of the seventh pipe was held high enough that it was just above the transmutation spot. When I let the center pipe move down further, the effect diminished considerably.
I also found that this “torsion CB” worked better than the standard only if the pipes were twisted so that they pointed into the swirl of the negative qi swirling downward. You can see the way they should go from Rich’s photo:

Construction

First a bucket with a template at the bottom — note that the holes are at the edge of the template, and they are a little larger than normal because the pipes will be at an angle and so will take more room in the template than if they were straight up and down:

I use four 1″ diameter 10′ long copper pipes, which I cut into 8 5′ lengths. Six for the regular pipes, one for the center pipe, and one I cut further into 6 equal (10″) pieces.On each of the small pieces I solder (or glue) a cap on one end and a coupling on the other. Instead of a cap one can also just place good tape (such as black electrical tape) over the end.

Then I cut a second wooden stabilizer, similar to the one in the bucket, with a larger diameter so that the holes are an inch or more from the edge for the disk. I also make a hole in the center, 1″ in diameter, for the center pipe to fit through later.

I put good quartz crystals in the bottoms of the small pipes, pour some metal shavings or bbs over the crystals so that the shavings/bbs come just to the top of the crystals, and then pour resin into the short pipes just to the tops of the crystals as well. Of course I first charge the crystals with charged water if that is available.

Then I place the 6 longer pipes vertically into the couplings of the shorter pipes and set them into the holes of the stabilizer at the bottom of the bucket. I place the other stabilizer over the pipes, and twist the stabilizer so that it looks something as follows:

I move it so it is close to a bench or table:

I then take a piece of tape and wrap it around the pipes just under the upper stabilizer so that the pipes will keep their position. I take another piece of tape and tape the structure to the table so that it will not tip over.

Now I pour metal shavings into the bucket around the pipes. I normally place several pieces of rose quartz in the shavings to soften the qi. It is safest to make two resin pours, just filling the bucket half-full with shavings for the first pour, and then bringing the shavings up to about a half-inch from the top of the bucket for the second pour.

When the resin is cured, I take the tape off which kept the pipes in place. Since the pipes are at an angle, the upper stabilizer will tend to fall lower and spread the pipes apart a little. I counter this by wrapping enough tape around the pipes just under the stabilizer so it supports the wood. Once the stabilizer is stabilized, I place the center pipe through that hole. I bring is just far enough down so that the bottom of the pipe is just barely above the narrowest part of the six pipes. To keep the center pipe from falling through further, I place a circle of tape around it just above the stabilizer:

Here is a finished product made by Rich. He and John do better work than I do in constructing them, and could probably improve on this tutorial.

This article was originally published on the Brother Jonathan Gazette on the 5th of December 2005
by Marshall Smith
newseditor@brojon.com

http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/the_tamiflu_myth.html

With the original title: What Big Pharma and the CDC Forgot to Tell the Doctors.
But the page does not exists anymore and this information is still vital and often still unknown to most people!
note: Temperatures are in Farenheit on this document.

Tamiflu was developed several years ago after lab tests showed it slowed the replication of viruses in the lab dish. Tests in humans showed it reduced the normal 5 to 7 day course of Flu by 1.5 to 2.5 days. It did not prevent, cure nor reduce the effects of Flu. At best it is a palliative or pain reliever to “treat the symptoms,” but not cure to the disease.

Most medical doctors mistakenly believe in the “anti-body” response of the immune system as the method by which the body fights viral infections. But not so. The body causes a fever above 101 degrees which stops the telomeres on the ends of the virus from allowing any viral replication.

The fever is the human or mammalian body’s primary generalized immune system response to any viral infection. Any palliative treatment which reduces the fever of flu infections will prolong the infection and may lead to irreparable damage or death, mostly from the resulting viral pneumonia. But the pneumonia was caused by lowering the fever and allowing uncontrolled viral replication in the lungs. Most cold and flu medications, including aspirin and Tamiflu are in this palliative class.

In the last two years, doctors have been treating patients who have H5N1 Bird Flu. The results are that 50% or half of the treated patients die of viral pneumonia. Were the deaths caused by a “new” more virulent strain of Bird Flu or was it the “new” use of a new anti-viral called Tamiflu? A good doctor would know the difference.

Solving the Problem of Viral Infections

Recently a BroJon Digest reader, named Doreen, wrote to ask some of the questions which were also asked by hundreds of other readers. She wrote:

“I read your article about the “Bird Flu”, and had a couple questions for you. First, are you a scientist? Second, while your article seems informative (and I agree with your conclusions that the so-called Pandemic is a major scam), I do not get enough information about the difference between Reproduction and Replication, concerning bacteria (reproduce) and virus (replicate)… replicate reminds me of Star Trek, and the replicators on the Enterprise! If you cannot explain the difference for me, can you refer me to a site that can?”

Very good questions. Yes, I am a senior scientist. I have multiple university degrees. I spent several decades working as a senior scientist/engineer for NASA. One of my NASA projects was the rat and monkey biological experiment which flew on the Shuttle Challenger in 1985. I worked directly with astronaut/scientist Dr. Robert Obermeyer. I worked in the ultra-clean lab, testing the cages and data-instrumentation which I built for the experiment, while Bob Obermeyer took the animals in the surgical room and implanted the animals with tiny transmitters which were then recorded on my computer system.

I have long been a medical researcher, but I don’t have a medical degree nor license. Thus I don’t see things the way most doctors do. One of the things with which I disagree with most, compared to the medical profession is how viruses replicate and infect cells.

Using my degrees in physics and engineering, I studied the surface coatings of viruses. That is how I discovered that the replication of viruses is a very close analog of sexual reproduction. I have not seen that written in any medical textbooks nor journal articles, so, Doreen, I can’t direct you to any websites for more information. So I will explain it to you as best I can.

The Big Difference Between Bacteria and Viruses – What Most Doctors Never Learned in Medical School

Bacteria are large single-celled animals which are large enough to be seen in a microscope. The bacteria is a protein bag enclosing a fluid which mimics sea water in saltiness and acidity. This reflects the fact that all animal and plant lifeforms on earth formed in the salty ocean of earth. Now, all animal cells carry their salty ocean internally. This cytoplasmic cell fluid contains many parts, including the nucleus of the cell which is very similar to a virus, and many primitive small sub-bacteria which are in each cell, called by such names as mitochondria and golgi-apparatus among others.

These sub-parts are very simple separate bacteria-like bodies which have specific functions in the cell such as collecting oxygen or actually doing the breathing, and other parts which take the sugar, fat and proteins in the blood stream and as they transfer into the cell fluid they are converted into food and energy for each cell. Thus, bacteria are living cells which, (1) can move, (2) can locate and eat food, combining the food and oxygen to make energy, and (3) can reproduce by making copies of each cell by dividing down the middle and making two new identical cells from the original one.

But, unlike bacterial cells, viruses are not alive. They cannot do anything which cells or bacteria can do. All viruses have only two simple parts, (1) a single long strand of a molcule called DNA which may have millions of atoms in the long string, and (2) an outer layer of protective protein bag material, which is made up of the broken parts of the cellular or bacterial protein bag from which the virus last escaped. Viruses are not alive and cannot grow their own protein bag coating. Viruses are so much more tiny than are cells, being made only of a single string of atoms, they cannot be seen with a normal microscope. They can only be seen with electron microscopes.

The DNA strand in the middle of the virus is a long string of connected single sugar molecules called Ribose. Onto each and every Ribose sugar molecule is then attached an amino acid. This process of making DNA can only occur inside a host bacteria cell which has a large supply of free amino acids floating in the salty cytoplasmic fluid. There are about 17 amino acids in the proteins which humans eat, but only 4 critical amino acids are used to make DNA. The banding or repeating pattern of the 4 amino acids, like a string of colored beads, is used to make partial copies of sections of the DNA to make protein-string hormones which control how cells operate and reproduce. These partial protein copies of small sections of the DNA molecule, are actually hormones which communicate with and control other cells, and are what make the cells of your body grow and live.

How Your Body Uses Viral-Type DNA Molecules — How DNA Is Used As a Normal Part of Making Your Body Work

The DNA molecules in your cells are similar to a virus DNA, but with several differences. The DNA in your cells are made of two parallel long strands which are electrically bonded together. Over simplifying how they are put together, you could say one half of the double strand came from your mother and the other half came from your father. The two halves are bonded together to make a diploid or complete double strand which makes a compete animal or plant DNA molecule found in the nucleus of all living cells. But the viral DNA is only half of the long double string molecule, it does not have a mother nor father. It only makes repeated identical copies of the original half or haploid molecule itself. Thus the virus cannot “reproduce” in the same way cells do.

But your body actually does the same thing. When a woman ovulates she causes complete cells, which normally divide in half, to instead divide into four parts in her ovaries to divide the original double strand DNA molecule into four single strand ova. Each ovum is a half or haploid version of your original DNA. The normal reproduction of all the cells in your body simply divide into two exact diploid copies. This process is called Mitosis and occurs in almost all of your cells every week or so. But once a month in women, certain cells in the ovary divide by a unique process called Meiosis which causes the cells to divide into four identical parts. But each new primitive cell has only half of the normal DNA strand. Each haploid cell is an ovum, and has the same atomic and molecular single-strand structure as a virus DNA.

The same thing occurs each month in men, when the sperm are made by dividing a body DNA molecule into four to make four haploid or half DNA molecules, which is all that is inside a sperm body. Neither ova nor sperm are living cells. They can’t reproduce by themselves. They are each more like a single haploid DNA virus. By sexual reproduction, which is almost exactly the same as a virus entering a cell, the haploid or half DNA from mother and father are combined into a diploid or full double DNA strand thus producing a new living cell, destined to become a new human being. Viruses don’t do that. They simply keep making exact copies of the original haploid or half DNA. They are not alive. They cannot grow or mutate from one form of bird flu into another. They are more like inanimate crystals, which can only copy more crystals. They don’t grow and mutate. Also, just like a sperm entering through the unique cell wall of an ovum, which is specific to each species, meaning a cow sperm cannot enter into a sheep ovum, a virus cannot enter into just any other cell which has a protein coating different from the coating on the original virus. That’s why humans can’t get bird flu.

The set of the specific four amino acids which are used to make DNA are called Nucleic Acids when they attach along the long strand of sugar Ribose molecules. When they are attached they are called Ribo-Nucleic Acids. When the whole long strand of millions of RiboNucleic Acids have completely attached from one end of the long chain to the other, it releases an Oxygen atom at the end of the string, carrying away an electron, and then the whole chain is stuck or bonded together by electrical forces. The release of the Oxygen atom is called Deoxyfication. This whole long chain, when it is completely filled, and then de-oxyfied is called De-oxy-ribo Nucleic Acid, or as we know it, DNA.

That is also all that a virus is. Just a long chain of millions of the four amino acids all stuck together in a certain pattern. The only difference between the millions of types of viruses, is the repeating bead-like patterns of the four amino acids along the chain. The virus DNA cannot move by itself, it cannot locate, breath and eat food, and it cannot divide in half and make copies of itself or reproduce the way bacterial cells do. A Virus does not fit the definition of a living thing. It is more like the repeating patterns of atoms in a crystal.

How Your Cells Use DNA to Reproduce But Viruses Can Only Replicate – The Mystery of Viral Replication Explained

The only thing that a virus does is a process called Replication. When a virus enters one of your cells, it escapes from within its own old protein surface coating and it stretches out into a long string. The viral DNA then collects millions of free amino acids floating in your salty cell fluid to make a mirror image copy of the four types of amino acids in the viral chain. This reversed mirror image chain is called Retro-deoxy-ribo Nucleic Acid or shortened to RNA. The RNA molecule is special and continues to make another mirror image of itself which is, of course, an exact copy of the original viral DNA. This unique method of making a mirror image of a mirror image to make an exact copy of the original viral DNA is the only method a virus can use to make copies. This is called Replication.

The RNA molecule string will then continue to make many, many copies which result in the original viral DNA now having thousands of exact duplicate DNA copies all made from the amino acids stolen from your cell fluid. This starves your cell of all the amino acids and in a matter of minutes, destroys it. The original virus and its many replicate copies are now free to invade your other body cells.

But before leaving the infected cell, the thousands of new viral DNA copies then steal pieces of the protein bag coating from your damaged and dying cell, and then covers the viral DNA with stolen cell wall material. This is the trick by which the virus can exist in your body. By covering itself with the old cell wall from your own cells, the virus then hides from your immune system, since the virus now looks like just one of your own friendly cells and not a dangerous foreign virus.

How A Single Virus May Seem To Be Hundreds of Different Types – The Difference Between Types H5N1 and H3N2 is the Stolen Surface Coat

This means that any certain virus may have many different surface coatings, depending on where it last came from. If it last came from a bird, it is a bird virus and can only infect birds. If the same virus had escaped from a pig or hog, then it is a porcine or pig virus. It is almost impossible for humans to get viruses from horses, dogs, birds or snakes.

Unfortunately, it is quite easy for humans to get viruses from pigs, because of the strange similarity in the tissue typing of pig and human tissue. The atomic structure of the surface coat on pig viruses are similar enough that the pig virus can enter human cells. This is why cell tissue from pigs, such as heart valves, pancreatic insulin and other body parts from pigs can be used in humans. Oddly, it is hard for viruses from our closest mammalian neighbors, the chimps and gorillas, to enter into humans. Simian viruses simply are not close enough with the same cell surface types as human viruses.

That is about as clear as I can explain Viral Replication. It is the process of the copying of atoms and molecules of DNA and RNA in a specific order. It has nothing to do with the dividing and splitting or Reproduction of living cells or beings.

The trick here, Doreen, is that for the viral RNA to make many, many replica copies of the original DNA virus, the viral RNA molecule must detach and release each new DNA copy into the cell fluid, to open up all the atomic connecting spaces along the chain of the long RNA molecule, in order to make room for the next new copy.

How To Instantly Stop The Viral Replication Process – Why Mammals are Different from Reptiles and Birds

What causes the RNA copy to completely release the newly made copy, and unzip the new DNA virus from the RNA master copy is something at the end of the molecule chain, called a telomere. When the DNA copy is complete, the electrical charge on the RNA Telomere changes, like flipping an electrical switch, and it then releases and repels the new DNA copy by electrical forces. But the RNA Telomere is temperature sensitive, it won’t release a new copy if it is too warm.

If the temperature of the Telomere on the end of the RNA chain is too hot — meaning above 102 degrees F, then the Telomere cannot unzip and release the new DNA copy. The RNA and the new DNA viral copy are electrically bonded together — and they are stuck — they can’t unzip and separate. Thus, the original viral DNA cannot replicate even one copy of itself using the RNA if you have a fever of about 101 to 102 degrees. That is why humans and all warm-blooded mammals on earth produce a fever when infected with a virus, since it prevents the original viral DNA from replicating any copies of itself at all. Thus — the end of the line for the original virus and any viral replication. That is also why most viruses on earth come from birds and reptiles, since they cannot raise their body temperature to cause a fever, and the viruses can run rampant among those animals. Sometimes a viral infections can wipe out and cause complete extinctions among reptiles, amphibians and birds. This is rare among warm-blooded mammals which can create fevers when infected with viruses.

That’s also why we have fevers. And that is why reducing the fever with Nyquil, or Aspirin or other cold and flu medications can kill you when the Viral RNA is allowed to unzip millions of copies of the original single Viral DNA molecule. Each new copy of the original viral DNA can then repeat the process and quickly produce billions of copies of itself in an hour or so, and start infecting more and more of your cells, until it kills you. But the high temperature or a fever will stop the viral replication process instantly.

Where to Look for More Information About Viral Replication – How and Why the CDC Has Misinformed the Public

So Doreen, I would suggest, instead of doing a web search about Viral Replication which doesn’t produce much information — do a web search on “Telomere” or “Telomeres” and find out about the latest research showing how they affect the aging of living cells and how they are sensitive to temperature. Then you will find out about how virus DNA molecules actually replicate. I don’t know of any practicing medical doctors who know much about telomeres and viral replication. It seems only medical researchers in the lab know about that important process.

Thanks for your questions, and I hope I have helped you understand Viral Replication. And yes, it’s pretty much the same way they did it on Star Trek — atom by atom. And even though there may be millions of atoms in the long DNA chain, it is so tiny that the Replication process can be completed in much less than a single second in time. Much faster than you can say “zip.”

Small overview

Shungite got its name from the village Shunga, on the shores of the Onezhskoe (Onega) lake in Karelia, Russia, where it was discovered in 1887. It started being studied more in depth starting from the 60′s.
It’s an organic compound composed in majority of carbon, silica and mica, which seems to have formed during the Precambrian era (4500 – 500 million years ago), but it remains a supposition among other, we’ll get back to it later.
It’s already important to note that it’s an organic compound (or mineraloid), it cannot be classified as a mineral compound.
Diamond and graphite are also organic compounds, FYI:

Organic compound:
Is a compound in which the molecule contains the carbon atom C, except carbon dioxide CO2 and carbonates M(CO3).

Mineral compound:
Is a compound in which the molecule does not contain the carbone atom; are considered as mineral compounds: carbon dioxide CO2 and carbonates M(CO3).

Quick description

Shungite is known for many of its peculiar properties, one of those being the presence of fullerenes, that being said it must be understood that apparently it contains only an tiny percentage of fullerenes, around 0.0001% and 0.001%. Bu tas small as it seems, it’s not negligible and it’s not the whole story!

The other, most known, properties of shungite are almost all due to this presence of fullerenes; sorption, desorption, catalytic oxidation; which are all the reason behind most of the virtues of shungite.

The structure of fullerene is quite a recent discovery, until 1995 this structure of carbon was unknown, it was thought that only two forms of carbon existed: graphite and diamond.

Graphite: An assembly of carbon atoms in flat layer of hexagons loosely bound across different layers, hence very friable.
	Diamond: A very solid structure (the most solid known) based on the repetitive arrangement of a precise pattern of 8 carbon atoms.
And now. Fullerenes : A structure in which the carbon atoms are disposed as hexagonal and pentagonal rings on the surface of a spheric shell.

There are many possible forms of fullerenes, natural and artificial: C24, C28, C32, C36, C50, C60, C70, C76, C84, …

Fullerenes contained in shungite are mostly C60. And it must be understood that shungite does not contain ‘normal’ fullerenes, they confer a very important property to shungite different form standard fullerenes. More precisely, it’s ‘water-soluble molecular compounds based on a fullerene-like core’ that are part of shungite. This creates an onion-like structure, in which the core is usually a C60 fullerene or fullerene like nanopowder; surrounded by hydrated or solvated layers; mostly hydrated by water molecules, which makes them water-soluble. Because pure fullerenes are not water-soluble, which makes them completely useless for living organisms! Wit hrespect to that, shungite is very special!

There is also another important difference between that structure of carbon and diamond/graphite. Shungite is stable, it cannot change state/structure. Whereas graphite can always transform into diamond (under pressure) and diamonds transform into graphite as soon as they are removed from the high pressure conditions they formed in. It’s a natural increase of entropy. Graphite is a form more stable than diamond, hence diamond naturally tends to re-transform into graphite when it can. But it’s veeeeery slow, before the diamond on a ring turned back into graphite, many hundreds of human generations will have worn that ring without noticing any change.

One can apparently create shungite by exposing it to high temperatures close to those found near the sun, above 4000 °C. I’m writing that, but I’m not sure, because the documentation I used as support is quite ambiguous on that subject… However, the reverse process is absolutely impossible, once it becomes shungite it remains as shungite forever! At least for now (April 2015) no one has found a way to transform shungite into something else.

History of its origins

The appearance/formation of shungite is still a mystery… We understand how it can form, but we don’t know if it happened on earth or somewhere else. A thing seems almost certain, as indicated earlier, shungite seems to date back to the Precambrian era, so if it is 1 billion years old or more is quite likely. What has been confirmed for the moment, is the way shungite could have formed, a study in the Onega lake it was determined that there was an accumulation of more than 1000m thickness of repeated layers:
1. of random strata
2. of migration of strata of diapir
3. of strata re-deposited of clastic rocks.

Which seems to be a big proof of diapiric formations linked to mud volcanoes. But nothing can be proven! The are a couple of known shungite deposits on earth, the largest is in Karelia, but there are also some in Zaire in the mine of Shaba, or in India in Andhra Pradesh, in the USA in the Michigan, in Russia in the region of the Ural, in Austria in the regions of Salzburg, Styria and Tyrol. Shungite: Shungite mineral information and data.
The other hypothesis often discussed, is that it is meteorites that brought shungite on earth. Because there are interesting photos made by Mr. Kovalevsky (Comparison of carbon in shungite rocks to other natural carbons: An X-ray and TEM study.) showing carbon structures, similar to those observed on shungite, that were observed on the remains of a meteorite.

The important point to remember, is that the conditions required for the natural creation of shungite (very high temperatures) couldn’t have happened on earth, except a long time ago. Hence, either all the shungite deposits formed with the conditions that existed on earth during the Precambrian era in places containing, among other things, a lot of carbon in various forms. Or there were different meteorites that brought shungite on earth in different locations. Diamond and graphite can form on earth nowadays with low temperatures (compared to those needed for shungite) and hence these forms of carbon could have formed later and can still form naturally nowadays, which is not the case for shungite, at least not with what is understood nowadays.

That’s why there’s no definite answer to this question up to now, no one can really tell. Personally I tend to think that a bit of both happened; some deposits formed on earth, others come form space.
Or maybe there are still other answers to be found which no one thought about yet..
Because I’ll get back to it below, neither the concentration of fullerenes (0.001%-0.0001%), nor the way they formed is clear, there are many documents saying quite different things!

Benefits of shungite

Now we arrive at something that is of interest to a lot of people!
In fact a lot of properties considered nowadays sometimes still bit mystical, are very easy to explain, it’s pure physical science!
I already explained above, shungite has three main properties, a large capacity for sorption and desorption and a natural tendency to promote a catalytic oxidation of complex molecules.
You’ll ask me, what does it mean?

Sorption
I use this term in its full meaning to show the difference between adsorption and absorption. Shungite has the property of adsorption, sorption being the generic name to describe the process by which a substance is ad/ab-sorbed by a sorbant. Adsoprtion is specific for the interaction between a liquid/gaseous (air, water for example) substance with a solid sorbant substance, here, shungite.
It’s this property that allows shungite to have depolluting/purifying properties on water, soils, air etc. The pollutant compounds in these gases/liquids end up being attracted and fixed on the surface of the molecules of shungite, and that’s not all!t!

Desorption
It’s simply the inverse process of sorption, which allows the sorbated molecules to detach from the substrate, i.e. the shungite to release what it attracted.

Catalytic oxidation
It’s the third very important property of shungite and without it, the shungites’ sorption and desorption properties wouldn’t be as interesting. A catalytic oxidation is the process of oxidizing substances thanks to a catalyst.
For example, like the catalytic converter of a car.
In the case of shungite, it is shungite itself that acts as the catalytic converter, apparently thanks to its hydrated fullerene-like compounds. Simply stated, shungite is able to decompose a complex molecule into its constituent elements. Lets take hydrocarbons for example, which are, grossly described, just chains of carbon and hydrogen atoms. Octane for example, which is the principal compound in our petrol, C8H18, under that form it is toxic for the environment, in the presence of shungite the atoms of carbon can be separated from the hydrogen ones by a catalytic oxidation to transform into molecules of CO2 and water molecules H2O.
Oxidation means that the atom binds with oxygen…

I won’t go into very complex details of chemistry; just note that these three properties of shungite, allow shungite to have massive de-polluting effects in a whole lot of different circumstances!
This is what gives the antioxidant properties to shungite, i.e. shungite attracts and neutralizes free-radicals if ingested.

I won’t go into the technical details that are a consequence of these properties, because I don’t even know them myself and there are still a lot of contradictions in the information I’ve found. Higher above I said: “neither the concentration of fullerenes (0.001%-0.0001%), nor the way they formed is clear”, it’s especially on that detail that I would like to have an answer.
The most in depth informations I found on the topic, from Eduard V. Osipov seem to indicate that it is more the way that shungite is extracted that engender these peculiar properties, it is during the extraction and the interaction with water that the nanoscopic matrices crystallize thanks to the solvating molecules. Which beget the apparition of fullerene-like compounds, but as I said higher up, are based on a fullerene-like core with successive layers added around it. It seems that shungite does not directly contain carbon fullerenes, but that during the process of extraction, the impurities (in majority metals and sulfur) plus water and the solvents used lead to the spontaneous formation of these fullerene-like structures with hydrated external layers. That afterward end up with/in the shungite in the form of dusts with nanometric components, which are, it seems, the real reason behind the properties of shungite.
I can hover not confirm anything, I’m just summarizing for you what I have found.
However, no matter the how, sorption, desorption and the natural tendency to promote catalytic oxidation are well documented.

Application examples:

• Shungite has a capacity to absorb the substances that are present in infinitesimal quantities in water. It’s perfect to deeply purify water, shungite is good to use in the final stages of water purification systems. It’s very useful to remove medical waster by-products, free-radicals, heavy-metals, etc.
• What is wonderful, is that shungite can equally well purify purify air, by putting it into air filters etc. It can also be used to purify soils, it is for example very useful to clean up (by sorption and catalytic oxidation) organochlorinated compounds: of which the most known are pesticides, “Chlorinated cyclodienes include aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, chlordane and endosulfan.”, also PCBs and dioxin Organochloride
• Another example is with heptyls (which are a form of alkyl), the normal recycling process for these compounds produces sub-products as toxic as the original compound! In the presence of shungite and under specific conditions (mix of sugar, manganese…) a purification of 100% has been reached. Deactivation of soil polluted with liquid propellant components

What is very important to note is that shungite has these 3 properties combined; sorption, desorption and catalytic oxidation; which can have effects on many molecules, simple ones and complex ones.
That means that you must also understand that shungite can become saturated with toxic compounds (by sorption), but it can also be cleaned and freed of these compounds (by desorption).

To explain what can happen, lets take an example of the cleaning up of petroleum compounds with some organochlorinated (pesticides..). The catalytic oxidation will transform the complex hydrocarbon and organochlorinated molecules into simple elements, i.e. water (based on the hydrogen and oxygen collected from teh air and present in the hydrocarbons and the hydrogen present in the organochlorinated compounds), CO2 and Chlorine. These elements in their simple forms are harmless and will simply be able to fix themselves to the shungite (by sorption) or be released in nature. However, it should be noted that organochlorinated compounds often contain heavy-metals in small quantities, and petroleum products do as well. Lets says lead and mercury, these two heavy-metals will be absorbed by the shungite.
In that case, slowly but surely the shungite will become saturated with heavy-metals which shouldn’t be released randomly in nature! Hence by cleaning the stone, to make it release these substances by desorption, it will need to be evacuated in the right place!
How to clean shungite? I’ll get to it further down.

Shungite qualities/classes

There are generally 3 classes of shungite on the market, these classes simply define the carbon content and amount of impurities in shungite.

• 1st class:

  1st class shungite contains 98-99% of carbon, or more. It is the most expensive, because it is the purest. It is apparently quite rare; less that 1% of the shungite is of that purity. It is non-crystalline and, without being polished, naturally shiny or with a metallic appearance. It has a very low density, stones of 1st class seem very light! Being almost only pure carbon, 1st class shungite is generally sold in its rough form, because it is quite brittle and hence hard to polish.
  

• 2nd and 3rd class:

  The 2nd class contains less than 98% of carbon, I cannot tell you exactly how much, because I can’t find precise details. It seems that it goes from 98 to 70% for 2nd class and from 70 to 30% for 3rd class. These classes contain much more silicate and mica. It’s the more abundant prevalence of silicate and mica that makes them less brittle and dull looking, non-metallic and powdery, when touched they darken our hands like coal. They can be found rough or as polished stones.
  Even when polished, be it 2nd or 3rd class, when taken in the hands they still have a tendency to blacken anything that comes in contact with them, however 2nd class containing a lot of carbon don’t blacken that much, they must be really rubbed to notice it!
  

• Other classes:

  Just for information, there are sometimes classes 4 and 5, or they can also be classified as A, B, C, D, E. All that you have to remember is that: A/1 is the one with the most carbon content and E/5 (or whichever is the lowest) is the one with the least carbon content.

Radioactivity

Since there are a couple of articles scaring people about this subject (more on the french internet!), it seemed important to speak about it!

For the anecdote, the absence of any sort of negative effect can be proven by the springs of Karelia, where shungite comes from, the N°1 health center of russia (Marcialnie Vodi, or Marcial Waters Resort) uses these sources abundantly. What’s interesting is that the Russian literature clearly states that these healing properties are due to the presence of shungite, but france completely ignores it and says that it is iron that is responsible for these effects, and that the health center attracts no one anymore… Marcial (Spa russe), that being said, the historic reputation of the healing properties of this place are known to all! For the fact that French literature, and English also (but a bit less), ignores shungite seems normal, because more than 90% of the sources of information I find about shungite are all from Russia, it seems that it attracts the attention of no person of science outside of Russia.
The second spring with healing properties due to shungite is in the north of the Onega lake, called “Tri Ivana”. Water there is completely transparent and there is nothing special measurable in it, and yet it heals skin problems with perfection.
Many people visited this source to get healed, in spite of the lack of infrastructures. Apparently the forest there is covered with clothes. According to a Russian custom saying that is a person is healed it should leave his/her clothes on the spot, many people seem to have been healed!

What I understand from that fits perfectly the way in which shungite is supposed to work, thanks to the hydrated fullerene-like molecules and hence the healing effects are probably not caused by the carbon directly, but by the interaction between water and shungite which promotes the spontaneous formation of these nanoparticles which then become hydrated fullerenes.

Lets get back to the radioactivity topic, I suppose it is possible that some stones coming from I don’t know where are radioactive, after all, these are stones coming from more or less deep hydrocarbons layers of the earth etc. Or it is not a well known fact, but all petrol extraction platforms become radioactive with time, because anything that comes from deep underground is radioactive to a certain degree.

As you can see it on this article from the New York Times in 1990: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/12/03/us/radiation-danger-found-in-oilfields-across-the-nation.html
Or this extract of an article of 1958 barely readable I managed to save long ago:

Anyhow, lets get back to business after this brief detour.

People are scared of radioactivity because it can cause genetic mutations. Personally I wonder if all these mutations are bad, can’t there be forms of light radioactivity that provoke beneficial mutations?
That’s what I think, because we’re still quite far from understanding radioactivity as a whole, we have alpha, beta, gamma etc. radiations, but the only thing that science takes into account is the energy of the vibration (and the mass of the particle for some cases), nowhere is the specific shape of the waveform being taken into account? Is it a pure sine wave, of a fundamental frequency modulated in a complex fashion (adding a lot of subharmonics or just some). While no one will be able to give me a satisfying answer to these questions, I cannot personally take into account what modern science has to say about the subject, it is way too simplified for my taste, I studied it at university, I know what I’m talking about!
Wilhelm Reich modified a Geiger counter to measure orgone and it seems very logical to ma, positive orgone being, from my point of view, just the presence of a lof of coherence/harmonics between many vibrations (be they electric, magnetic, electromagnetic, physical/auditive) and deadly orgone being just an absence of harmony/coherence; or even better said, extreme destructive interferences and signals that can’t be harmonics of anything, for example like PSK which creates totally deformed waveforms that cannot be put in coherence with anything… Anyway it seems logical to me that we can induce harmonicities or in-harmonicities between multiples waves at an atomic scale as well and thus that it can be measured.

That being said, you don’t have to bother about my point of view on this matter, to ease your minds I bought a Geiger counter to measure the radioactivity levels on shungite I bought, so it’s simple and what I think becomes irrelevant in terms of convincing about that matter.

(The radex counter doesn’t measure alpha radiations)

I explained the calculations a bit too quickly on the video, for scientific people these are useless explanations, and for those that don’t understand it was too quick!
There are units, my counter measures in µSv/h. To convert to different units (nano, micro ,milli), 1000000 nSv = 1000 µSv = 1 mSv
And official organisms usually use mSV per year as a measuring unit, and not by hour. In a year there are (365 days) X (24 hours) = 8760 hours.
To convert the values from the counter (µSv/h) to (mSv/year) you have to multiply the value of the counter by 8760 (hour -> year) and divide by 1000 (micro -> milli), which makes in the end a simple multiplication by 8,76.
So.
Official organisms, depending on the country will show, that 1-3 mSv/year is the average dose a human is exposed to on this planet, from natural sources and human sources combined.

With the value I measured in my workshop on the box of shungite rocks, 0.14 µSv/h, which makes 1.23 mSv/year.
With the value I measured in my room on samples of shungite from http://shungit-store.com/, 0.21 µSv/h, which makes 1.84 mSv/year.
Whichever I chose, it is within the accepted doses for humans, much less that an average smoker, much less than someone having a CT scan each year, etc.
And there is no need to remain near the shungite all the time, as you saw, when I went a couple of meters away to measure the levels somewhere else in my room, it was around 0.10 µSv/h (0.876 mSv/year)…

As you can see on the diagram above we’re far from the dangerous levels of 20-100 mSv/year etc.
It’s up to you, for me this light natural radioactivity is fine, I feel that this stone is beneficial for me at some moment, so I won’t stop using it!
For information, on the french vidéo I made, the counter gave 0.18 µSv/h (1.57 mSv/year) for both measurements.

I don’t hide it, one of the sellers I talk about in the video, http://shungit-store.com/ made a deal with me, where I get 10% on all sales passing through here. Hence in return, it seemed normal to me to explain what/how to use shungite and to certify that the shungite they sell is indeed shungite, not much more radioactive than other naturally radioactive stones, for example like granitic places in the middle of france (~3 mSv/year).
Because there is some controversy about shungite being highly radioactive and dangerous. Maybe these people got stones that weren’t shungite.
To get back to http://shungit-store.com/ I accepted their offer because they have fantastic prices, I didn’t want to become another middlemen to increase prices needlessly, it’s best to send you directly to the source! However it takes around 2 weeks for the package to arrive (to europe) because it’s coming from russia. For heavy orders (above 1kg) shipping prices are more consequent, but for small orders, some stones, bracelets, etc. it’s great. I would just be grateful if you told them you come from here if yo udecide to get something from them.

How to use shungite

With all that I’ve described previously, we can summarize everything more or less as follows.
Shungite can be used to purify all sorts of environments, for the air, for the soil, for liquids…
It also has, thanks to these same purifying properties, powerful antibacterial and aseptic effects, it’s useful to use it as an antiseptic.
Shungite is also very useful to treat humans, animals and plants, just thanks to its depolluting properties and the fact that it can be ingested without any troubles, like activated charcoal.
What’s also interesting, is to use a shungite stone near a wound, an hematoma or any kind of injury (open or closed) creating various pains. It should mechanically lower the pain in many cases, because our body reacts to such injuries by releasing enzymes, white blood cells, red blood cells etc. to heal the injury, but also free-radicals and various toxins due to the inflammatory reaction. Placed on the painful zone, shungite will attract these molecules and toxins released by our body, usually these molecules partly increase our pain!
Apparently Koreans use shungite to purify fish of the toxins they accumulate in seawater! Personally that seems, to me, to be a very good idea to apply to the fish we eat! Let the fish bath in water with shungite. What I’d recommend, to have quick effects, is a container with approximately half of the volume in water and half of the volume as rough shungite stones. And just place the fish in it for a couple of hours should be more than enough to benefit from the absorbing properties of shungite.
With much less shungite, just bathe the fish for longer…
I will talk about the properties to protect against electromagnetic waves below and separately.

Metaphysical properties

I use these terms to indicate that I’ll now go a bit astray from what’s considered objective and material science, to speak about subtle things and about properties that are still difficult to prove with objective/material means.
Shungite seems to restore the mental health of a person, which is great, because it’s simple and it works well!
Shungite, like orgonite, seems also to be able to neutralize geopathogen zones.
You will see on any lithotherapy website that the classification of shungite is quite special, naturally, being a black stone it has grounding features and protection/absorption of the surrounding negativity, like many other black stones, for example black tourmaline, black obsidian etc.
But on top of that, shungite has a powerful effect on all chakras, to realign/recenter them. That’s why I love it personally, I feel as if the stone is always changing its “attitude” all the time to adapt to the needs. Sometimes it works more on one chakra, sometimes more on another one, sometimes on multiple ones at once. It’s very special!
For me it’s not metaphysical at all, shungite works in the same way orgonite does, I’ll explain it below, keep on reading, it’s not over.

Protection against electromagnetic waves

Shungite is a relatively good electrical conductor (a couple of ohms of resistance), with apparently a high attenuation for electromagnetic waves.

For your information:
The electrical conductivity is a very practical property to know if your have proper shungite. You just have to measure the resistance of the stone with a voltmeter, if it indicates a couple of ohms, it is shungite. Else any other stone is almost always non-conducting and hence will indicate you an infinite resistance.

To get back to the attenuation, it is expressed in term of frequencies, for example sunglasses attenuate well the intensity of visible light, but they change nothing for a lot of other frequencies. And I do not know these details with regards to shungite.
All I found mentioning attenuations at the frequencies of interest to us (microwaves) are documents from the Minsk University in Belarus with tests on pyramids covered of a shungite powder paint or filled with shungite. Indicating that the paint or the stone have an attenuation around 20 to 25 dB for frequencies above 2 GHz, Shielding Properties of Electromagnetic Radiation Absorbers with Geometrical and Structure Heterogeneities.
That being said, these details are not very important, it’s not in the plans of many people to paint a room with a shungite powder paint, or to cover a room with shungite tiles. It would be using the same principles as making Faraday cages, therefore someone intending to do that might as well make a metallic Faraday cage that blocks everything!

Metatechnical explanation of shungite :
However what is of interest to me is the structure of shungite, it is very similar to orgonite! It’s an electrical conductor with a resistance of a couple of ohms and it is exactly the same for the resin/metal mix of orgonite. Shungite is mainly composed of carbon, with silica (SiO2 = quartz!) and mica ‘impurities’ and also other small impurities, of which metals. Orgonite is composed of long carbonated chains, metal and quartz.
But shungite can also act on the magnetic components of electromagnetic fields. It can been seen exactly like orgonite, shungite can capt/emit electromagnetic waves, electric fields and the quartz inside shungite can act as an oscillator and then the shungite can re-emit the harmonized signal thanks to the quartz. However, in shungite, the carbon acting as conductor can also conduct magnetic fields, I don’t know exactly what it can lead up to, certainly with interferences it can influence the totality of the electromagnetic waves that are picked up and not only just on the electric fields as with orgonite.

I find in that sense that shungite is even more powerful than orgonite, because it can play on the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetic waves, but shungite is so special that we cannot tell on what it will act. With an orgonite, we put some stones in it and we know more or less on which energetical aspects it will act. Shungite, does as it pleases!
Adding shungite in orgonite is an evident positive bonus I just don’t do it generally (up to now, may 2015), because I find shungite way too powerful and unpredictable , it can really affect us very strongly, I don’t feel ready to take that responsibility, because by doing that I’m expecting even more questions and effects on people. Shungite is, I feel, a very powerful ally for personal growth, without even mentioning the above discussed cleaning properties that are easily proven by science!
That being said, shungite is self-sufficient, it doesn’t need to be inside an orgonite to have enormous effects.

How to cleanse/purify shungite?

From an energetical point of view, it is said almost everywhere that shungite cannot get charged and hence doesn’t need any cleaning/cleansing.
But from a more down to earth point of view, for water filters for example, it is recommended to change the stones every 6 months of so, because they’ll be saturated with toxic compounds etc. absorbed to purify the water.
How do we reconciliate these two aspects, it doesn’t need to be purified but it absorbs toxins physically? According to me there is nothing to reconcile, it goes perfectly well with what I understand about shungite! Whether we see it from a ‘spiritual’ or ‘materialistic’ point of view, for me it changes nothing at all! The additional property; on top of sorption, desorption and catalysis; which is obvious in my opinion, is a process of vibratory harmonization, like orgonite, as I explained in the previous chapter. That’s also the reason why it cannot charge itself with bad energies, energetically speaking, because it works like an orgonite, it transmutes inharmonious vibes mixes into harmonious ones.
And with regards to the concern of purifying it physically, “when it accumulated too many toxins”. I talk about the subject on this page,
Questions about Cloudbusters > Chemtrails? and I don’t need to say anything else here either.

I cannot prove how the cleaning of the toxic compounds in chemtrails occurs, but my theory is quite simple. It’s an atomic transmutation of the elements, i.e. a transformation of the nucleus of these harmful materials, which transforms them into harmless elements. But don’t come to me for remarks , I studied that myself at university, the transmutation of elements is not considered as a possible feat at such low energies… But that’s a much vaster topic, for me it’s obvious the orgonite acts on the vibrational structure of atoms at an atomic scale, but that’s beyond the actual scientific understandings, hence patience, the time will come.

Shungite can free itself from the accumulated toxins by desorption, by rinsing it with water or other ‘cleaning’ things, however here I can unfortunately not tell you what works best and how. And then by transmuting the toxins as well.
I think it’s just an equilibrium to respect, if shungite is exposed to too many toxins too quickly it won’t be able to transmute everything quickly enough, hence you’ll need to clean it up physically. Generally it is recommended to change the shungite stones used to purify water every 6 months, as I said above. But I don’t think it is necessary to throw them away, but I do think it’s good to have a couple of different batches to interchange them once in a while to let others self-clean themselves, while other are doing the work etc. And as with orgonite, I’m convinced that you just have to leave shungite outside in contact with the elements of nature and it will self-cleanse.
But I’d tend to leave shungite for many weeks outside, for orgonite a couple of hours is enough, because orgonite just cleanses energetically (yes, it ends up also transmuting toxins, but shungite absorbs them physically.. orgonite does none of that), shungite does both! Energetically and physically; I feel shungite deserves more relaxing/recharging time.

Documents used for the writing of this article :

Deactivation of soil polluted with liquid propellant components
A giant Palaeoproterozoic deposit of shungite in NW Russia: genesis and practical applications
The structure and composition of natural carbonaceous fullerene containing mineral shungite
Shungite: Shungite mineral information and data.
Supramolecular Self-assembly of Carbon Structures from Shungite Rock Using Only Water
Interaction of shungite carbon nanoparticles with blood protein and cell components
Natural Fullerene-based Self-assemblies during Fullerenes Extraction from Shungite Rocks Using Only Water
Healing Shungite: From Mystifications to Reality (Eduard V. Osipov)
Comparison of carbon in shungite rocks to other natural carbons: An X-ray and TEM study (Kovalevsky)
Shielding Properties of Electromagnetic Radiation Absorbers with Geometrical and Structure Heterogeneities
Backup of the data used/cited in this article: data

The 528 Hz frequency, known in the new age movement for its healing properties is not correct. 528 Hz is the frequency of C/Do based on the natural frequency of A/La 440 Hz. But 440 Hz is not a correct frequency, it is a modern frequency, but historically it’s never been the base frequency used for classical music!

Sicne millennia, instruments have been tuned with the A/La 432 Hz frequency. Using this frequency as a standard we get 518.4 Hz, not 528 Hz. As it can be seen clearly on the following tables:


La/A 432 Hz:

La/A 440 Hz:

One thing that can be seen straight away with 432 as a standard is that all other frequencies are always exact, there are no irrational numbers as it happens when using 440 Hz giving 733.33333 or 586.66666 etc. This is true for any octave, frequencies are always exact.

I’ve been and still am trying to understand why 432 Hz was chosen (and the number in itself), I still never reached a clear cut conclusion, but there are very interesting things linked with this number. At least for music it is evident that using 432 Hz as a tuning pitch for all notes allows us to have exact frequencies for all notes.

For information, nowadays it’s the equal tempered scale that is the most used (for digital applications), because it’s an approximation of the exact scale to simplify it by dividing the octave in 12 equal chromatic intervals.
I won’t dwell into the details; in the equal tempered scale we switch from one semi-tone to the next by multiplying by 2^(1/12), 2^(2/12), 2^(3/12), 2^(4/12) etc.

La/A 432 Hz:

La/A 440 Hz:

Isn’t it ugly?… I wonder why we use this simplification, even in the past, when computers weren’t that powerful, it makes no sense, these logarithmic multiplications are way more complicated than the use of the perfect ratios, and on top of that, all the frequencies have decimals up to infinity…
There’s no doubt, for people who love maths, the choice of La/A 432 with perfect ratios gives the most beautiful results, and by far, all frequencies are perfect.

FYI: some people told me that the Do/C 528hz is based on a La/A 444hz… Yes, if we use this equal tempered scale, 444 x 2^(3/12) = 528.007959. But unlike using perfect ratios, it’s not an exact frequency and of no interest to me.

Visual spectrum:

The informations available on chakras and their relationship to musical notes all indicate the same. C/Do represents the root chakra, D/Re the navel chakra, E/Mi the solar plexus, F/Fa the heart chakra, G/Sol the throat chakra, A/La the third eye, B/Si the crown chakra. One thign I never understood is why C/Do was chosen as the note to start the octave? Because it could technically start from any note, octaves would still be correct, it wouldn’t change anything, so there must be a precise reason for starting at C/Do.. The only thing I observe is that C/Do is that famous note with a frequency of 518.4 Hz (mistakenly believed to be 528 Hz..)

Here’s a visual table associating chakras to the musical notes and to the visual color spectrum. What I’m also intrigued by, historically speaking, is: who chose to name musical notes that way? There are 7 precise notes par octave (Do/C, Re/D, Mi/E, Fa/F, Sol/G, La/A, Si/B) and historically speaking we’ve also always spoken of 7 chakras… I’m sure that there are some sacred mathematical relationships behind that choice!

One other interesting fact to note is that the visual spectrum that we are able to see as humans is almost exactly delimited by one musical octave. It’s somewhat simple and evident, but still, I’ve never had anything like that mentioned in any lectures while I studied at university, why us, why humans, why are we limited to almost exactly the equivalent of one musical octave as far as our visual perception is concerned? I would even say that our visual perceptions are exactly delimited by one octave of the electromagnetic spectrum (light), which is our visual octave. In older books, written prior to approx. 1950, scientists at the time often used that term of « visual octave », probably because at the time scientists were savants, they had knowledge not only in their specific field of study, but in all domains of terrestrial knowledge, including music. Whereas nowadays it’s generally not the case anymore..

To show that I have to transform the audio frequencies into a wavelength by choosing an appropriate and arbitrary velocity for the propagation of sound (very unlikely here, as it’s close to zero..) such that these wavelengths are in the range of the visual spectrum (~400-700 nm).

We can see that this arbitrary chocie gives us wavelength between 390 nm (used as the initial wavelength) and 731 nm, which is quite close to the real values of the visible spectrum, these limits are not even precisely defined… Sometimes we can read that our vision is between 380nm and 750nm, other times 360nm and 740nm, also 380nm and 720nm, etc. No one knows exactly, I would tend to believe that it starts around 360nm because our eyes can’t physically support shorter wavelength (and still, measurement vary depending on the human subjects). But here again, we have to take into account the photopic (good lighting conditions, diurnal vision) and scotopic (night vision), which are never determined to be exactly the same by different experiments. I’m sure that there is a mathematical way to perfectly determine the ideal visual octave for a human being.

I’ll put forward a somewhat crazy idea, which for me is evident! When we’ll discover the direct relationship between sound and light science will take a huge leap forward in many domains of research. For me it is evident that this link exists even though all I studied at university tried to convince me that this is not the case.

Without talking about sound frequencies, I’ll just leave you with the following image of the vescia piscis which is a well known geometry present in all human eyes! …I have no idea what to make of this as of yet…

Please note that √324 = 18 et √81 = 9 et √9 = 3. What attracts me a lot is this mirror numerology effect : 432 ~ 324 and 108 ~ 81. Which is also true with √972 √(3/4) = √729

Numerology:

Another very important detail in my opinion proving that the choice of 432 with perfect ratio is all but random, is that all frequencies become a 9 if reduced to a single digit following the rules of numerology, for any octave.

Let’s use a different octave that the one used in above examples, for example La/A 1728 Hz (4 x 432), two octaves above.

You can play around with it for any octave, in any case it always comes back to 9, because changing octave just means multiplying or dividing by 2, when you do that, in numerology it always comes back to 9:
9 x 2 = 18 = 1+8 = 9
9 / 2 = 4,5 = 4+5 = 9

The musical choice of La/A 432 Hz with perfect ratios is the only one giving such a perfection in numerology for all frequencies.

As a more general rule, if the base frequency is a 9, any multiplication of that 9 by any of these ratios will alway give a 9. In fact we could use La/A 414, 423, 441 etc. But, no one ever spoke of such frequencies, this is just to explain some mathematical rules that apply to numerology.

That being said, do note that not all fractions work, these ratios are very well chosen, for example 432 x (4/9) = 192 = 1 + 9 + 2 = 3, or 432 x (46/19) = 1045.894737… I repeat it again, the choice of these ratios, is all but random!

The two arrangements, known since a long time are the 108 and 114. Based on my intuitions, the flower of life naturally combines the yin and yang and the 108 is the yin part and 114 the yang part. I tried for many hours to combine the both together and I ended up on a new balanced arrangement, that just by its number of points already seems quite intriguing, 144.

Here’s the 144 with the flowers of life that helped me draw it (on the left) and a simpler version (on the right) to know how to place the orgonites.

To figure out this arrangement I used flowers of life interleaved with other, it’s kind of a large extension of the flower of life if I can say it so.

Here are the 108 (left) and 114 (right) superposed on the 144.

What makes me believe that the 108 is the yin part (feminine) of the flower of life, is that the arrangement is based on flowers of life that intersect. Each red circle crosses a part of the two neighbouring red circles and also the central green circle.
Whereas for the 114, which I think is the yang aspect (masculine), the blue circles don’t intersect, they are adjacent and also adjacent and surrounding the central green circle without ever crossing it.
I can’t explain it more than that, that’s how I understand it.

That’s how I imagine that energy flows through this configuration, the energy is absorbed/received by the yin parts and expands/extends through the yang parts. That’s how I understand a balanced yin/yang equilibrium, it needs one part that creates/expands (yang/masculine) and one part the absorbs/receives (yin/female) to get feedback on the creation and inform the yang part how to keep on creating/expanding correctly in a balanced fashion.
How I see it on this schematic, if you look at the green lines going outward, they always leave perpendicularly wrt. to the sides of the central hexagon. The red parts have an hexagon/vortex with a dot inward and one outward, to make a link between the outside and the central source. Whereas the blue parts have 2 dots on top of the blue hexagon, but these two dots are directed exclusively to the outside while also splitting up (expansion/creation).
That’s it, I don’t really know what else to do with this idea.

The only practical thing I discovered in relation to the cloudbuster is that there seem to be a perfect ratio to respect between the pipes, depending on the pipes diameter if we want a cloudbuster that is more yin or yang.

Here, yin, based on circles that intersect, for a pipe of diameter D, the spacing between the center of the 144 and the center of a pipe is, 3 x D x cos 30°, for example for a pipe of 28mm diameter, the spacing is of 7.27cm or 14.55 for two pipes opposed from the center.

Here, yang, based on adjacent circles, for a pipes of diameter D, the spacing between the center of the 144 and the center of a pipe is of 3 x D, for example for a pipe of 28mm diameter, the distance is of 8.4cm or 16.8cm for two pipes opposed from the center.

The last thing this arrangement seems to indicate (at least to my understanding), is that in a cloudbuster, the 6 pipes each induce a vortex that all combine together to form the larger central vortex. There are many people who tried to make cloudbusters with 7 pipes (one added central one) and ended up in the end with a cloudbuster that work not as good as one with 6 pipes. Based on what I understand, I think that’s normal, the central space between the pipes should be left empty so that the larger vortex can freely form itself.

I wanted to add some more technical details, because the original document has a couple of errors; that being said the schematics and setups described are correct, but the explanations are not completely right and incomplete for my taste.

Documents talking about electroculture exist in two versions, there are two types of electroculture, which can both be complementary of each other I believe:

• Coming from the anglophone world: many documents describe a type of electroculture that consists, for the most part, in using high voltages generated by generators (mostly Tesla coils) and which, by various methods are sent into the soil or in the air around the plants to aid their growth.
• From the francophone world: another type of electroculture is described, which here is based on the natural properties of some materials to attract the electrons in the air and in the soil to make them flow better where needed.

These two versions are complementary, in my opinion. But it’s good to know about these differences because when looking around on internet we easily end up on documents talking about electroculture, the same subject, electroculture, but both don’t describe the same methods at all.

The francophone version of electroculture is based on the use of specific materials arranged in specific ways to reap more benefits from a natural property of all materials, i.e. the electronegativity of the elements. Some materials are more electronegative than others, hence by using these various materials properly one can direct the flow of electrons which are naturally collected from the surroundings.

The anglophone version is also very interesting, in all documents I read it’s based on using high voltages generated by Tesla coils, and as explained in other places on this website, Tesla coils are known to be the best orgone generators, they generate currents with very high voltages and very low currents using the principles of resonance. It’s resonance that makes it a great idea, as i explain it somewhere else on this website about my understanding of how orgonite works, orgonite seems to work by an effect of resonance, re-creating electric fields at a pure/perfect frequency. A Tesla coil generates very high voltages at a high frequency, but more importantly of a purity that is almost unmatched, i.e. perfectly regular sinusoidal waves. And as you might already know, I think that these perfectly regular electric fields are most beneficial to all living things; plants, insects, animals, humans and probably for what we consider as inanimate. Plants love classical music, which is also a very clean sound vibration, with perfect harmonics between different notes. Hence I think that plants also love perfect vibrations of any other type, here electric. It is a subject I want to talk about at some point in the future.

Meanwhile, lets get back to electroculture, francophone version, which is based on the electronegativity of all elements that exist on this planet.

Electronegativity is simply the natural tendency that a material has to attract electrons, the higher it is the more the material attracts electrons. That’s what I wanted to correct/explain from the original text from 1978 (Electroculture – Basics), which I noticed while I was re-transcribing it.

Electropositivity does not really exist, it’s a relative measure of electronegativity, i.e. gold has for example an electronegativity of 2.4 (or 2.54 according to other measures), iron has an electronegativity of 1.83, hence compared to gold, iron is electropositive because gold attracts electrons much more than iron does. We can only talk about the electropositivity of a material with regards to another, it makes no sense to talk about an electropositive element on its own… No, we can just say that it is more/less electropositive (or less/more electronegative) compared to another one.

Hence, technically here’s a periodic table, not very precise, with the electronegativity of known elements. Chemistry is good in small doses, and not that hard! However I won’t go into the details about how electronegativity is determined because it becomes much more complicated!

Here you can see that fluorine (F) on the top right is the most electronegative element. We shoudl talk about the electronegativity of alloys and combinations of different elements, because in nature and in our society we often have things that are not pure, like brass which is a mixture of copper and zinc, quartz, which is silicate and oxygen etc. all these combinations also have their own electronegativity, but it becomes much harder to determine. Hence lets stick to pure materials, and those that are of interest for electroculture, which I’ll order by decreasing order of electronegativity:

• Gold (Au): 2.4
• Platinum (Pt): 2.2
• Silver (Ag): 1.93
• Copper (Cu): 1.9
• Iron (Fe): 1.83
• Zinc (Zn): 1.65
• Aluminium (Al): 1.61

That’s enough! Just by looking at those values you can understand why precious metals are so useful in electronic circuits, because not only are they excellent conductors of electricity, but also very electronegative (as far as metals are concerned). However, please do note that a high electronegativity does not mean a high electrical conductivity, Fluorine is the most electronegative element, hence also very reactive, since it attracts electrons very easily it always has a tendency to bond with other elements and hence is not easily available in its pure form in nature. But fluorine is not an electrical conductor, since electrical conductivity depends mostly of the fact that the element has one electron on the outer orbit, or maybe two, but fluorine has seven…

Anyway, lets get back to electroculture. We now have the electronegativity of the most common metals, so we can look in details at the setups of electroculture.Lets look at schematic A which I re-edited for more clarity.

Graphite is a form of carbon, so I used the electronegativity of carbon, 2.55, it might not be 100% accurate, but even if it were 2.3 or 2, it’s clearly more than the electronegativity of zinc, which is 1.65. Hence the carbon electrode attracts more electrons than zinc, which means that the natural flow of electrons will flow in the copper wire, going from the zinc electrode toward the graphite electrode. Here electrons are collected from the infinite pool of electrons which are in the soil! If the electrodes are in contact with the air they will also clearly collect some electrons from the air. What must be also clearly understood, why I added red dotted arrows, is that electrons will also flow through the soil from one electrode toward the other, since the soil is also an electrical conductor (with varying resistance depending on humidity and the minerals in it). This setup is clear, it promotes a good flow of naturally available electrons through the soil and through the air, through the copper wire.

Now let’s look at schematic B, which I also re-edited.

Just before carrying on, when building your setup, always keep an eye on the directions north, south, east, west on the various schematics, on some the north is upward, on some the south is upward..

Here it must be clearly understood that there are two parts, the antenna and the grids. The antenna has a tip in a metal that is less electronegative than the tube. It’s done on purpose, in the original document they explain that we must use iron wire, but zinc is also suitable. The copper tube is the most suitable, because it has an electronegativity of 1,9, which makes it easy to find other metals that are less electronegative for the antenna tip; zinc (1,65), iron (1,83). The tip of the antenna is less electronegative than the tube, hence electrons will naturally flow toward the tube. The purpose of the antenna is to collect electrons from the air. Then you must also remember that in this installation, the antenna is insulated from the soil! It’s very important, there shouldn’t be any electrical conduction between the base of the antenna and the ground. Else like a lightning rod, the excess of electrons will go straight to the ground. This is not what we want, we want to collect the electrons in the air and send them to the galvanised iron mesh first!

You will also notice that when we connect the copper tube with a standard electric cable (in copper) to the galvanised iron mesh in the soil, the copper has an electronegativity of 1,9 and iron only 1,83. Hence you would think that electrons will go from the grid toward the copper tube since it has a higher electronegativity, the copper tube should attract electrons more than the iron mesh… But, it’s not the case, because we shouldn’t forget that electrical currents always want to go to the ground, lightning hits the ground, we insulate our houses with ground rods. It’s a bit of a paradox, earth is as much of a large supplier of electrons as an attractor of electrons. It’s because the ground always attracts electrons, that it’s full of charges.. And anyway, that being said, there are loads of free electrons anywhere around us!

Hence here, the electrons accumulated from the air in the antenna are transferred to the iron grid, because this grid is connected to the soil, thus electrons will naturally want to go in that direction, electronegativity is not a factor of importance for this transfer of energies from antenna to the ground grid. Then we have an antenna that provides electrons to this iron mesh and these electrons arrive in the iron mesh and will diffuse into the soil, the electrons will first go from the antenna through the grid because iron is a better conductor than the soil (it has less resistance). this is where the other opposite mesh will play its role, since it’s once again copper, or any other metal more electronegative than iron, the electrons going through the iron mesh will have a slight tendency to be attracted in the direction of the opposed mesh before dispersing anyway in the end…

From an electrical point of view it’s obvious, electrons always take the path of least resistance; hence they arrive in the iron mesh and then into the ground, but since on another side there is a copper mesh, slightly more electronegative, this will naturally induce a path of slight less resistance in the direction of the copper mesh (because added to the soil resistance there is also the copper attraction..)

Another important point that must be observed is that the meshes should be placed east and west, because we want to leave the north-south path free for the natural magnetic field of the earth.

Now I’m talking from my own understanding of the subject, why must we have the direction of electrons flow from east to west? And not west east? If we take into account the rotation of the planet, if we could leave and object in the air without it being affected by the gravity of the planet, and also not the inertia etc. As the earth rotates, this object would be somewhere else on the planet without having to be moved. By making electrons flow from east to west, the earth rotates in the opposite direction, hence this promotes in a minimal fashion an easier flow for the electrons from east to west instead of the opposite. Also, given the fact that electrons are so light, they are not affected by gravity like normal objects. But it becomes hard to talk about these subjects, because we have go into the topic of relativity..

Furthermore, there is also another interesting aspect that seems to me important to take into account, and electromagnetic wave is composed, as its name indicates, of a magnetic field and an electric field.

A light particle (shown here as the green dot), going to the right, with the electric and magnetic fields shown here above. If we take into account that the natural magnetic fields going north to south and the electric fields going from east to west sort of encourage electromagnetic waves to superpose on these same electric and magnetic fields, we can induce that the installation above helps light particles to go toward the soil. The natural telluric currents and magnetic fields are in these directions anyway. This electroculture setup fosters the penetration of the light into the soil.. If that makes any sense, that’s how I understand it. We shouldn’t forget that what we see is just but a tiny part of the electromagnetic spectrum, many other waves at other frequencies invisible to our eyes can be guided toward the soil, from my point of view cosmic waves are also electromagnetic waves.

Lets go to schematic C, also re-edited.

This setup, instead of promoting the natural flow of electrons, amplifies the strength of the natural magnetic field. Don’t forget while looking at the image, that the needle of a compass pointing to the magnetic north means that  what we consider as the north is in fact a magnetic south pole, it’s a convention that is not always evident, still logical though! This setup does not need to be explained more than that, because here it’s not about the electronegativity of metals, this should more be called magnetoculture… The magnet simply amplifies the natural alignment of electrons inside the iron mesh, which is a ferromagnetic materiel and hence electrons can keep their alignment more or less permanently. Here we can’t use a copper grid or any other non ferromagnetic metal, a ferromagnetic metal is absolutely needed.

Here we amplify the natural magnetic field of the planet while not disturbing the telluric (east-west) currents.

Schematic D now.

This setup is clearly the most simple to put in palce, in a flower pot, around any plant in the garden. But it is in my opinion slightly less efficient than method B or C. Also if we orient setup A correctly, the setup A, I think, is also more efficient than this one.

However, this one is still the easiest and it’s still much better than nothing, it will bring great benefits in any case. The negative point I see here is that the natural flow of electrons in the soil will be multidirectional and hence it’s not on ly in the direction of natural telluric currents. Nonetheless this setup still clearly amplifies the electron flow in the soil and above soil. The antenna is the same as in setup B, with a tip made of a metal that has an inferior electronegativity than the copper tube, thus it attracts electrons from the air, to the tube and to the soil. But here the antenna is directly planted into the soil. Here again we can see it in two parts like, setup B, that are somewhat independent of each other, but still related!

The antenna is directly planted in the ground and hence the electrons collected from the air naturally go to the path of least resistance, the soil. Then the surrounding grid, in galvanised iron mesh, with an electronegativity lower than copper, will, I believe, collect electrons from the soil and also those from the antenna and then again there will be an electron flow going from the mesh to the antenna. And so on the cycle continues, they go back in the antennas, are re-diffused into the soil, partly re-collected by the mesh, etc.

This setup, as I understand, helps naturally collected electrons to flow in a sort of ‘closed loop’ in the same space much longer than they would otherwise without any setup. Which allows the plants to have more time to collect more abundant electrons, which have a tendency to re-circulate in the same place over and over.

Finally there is schematic E, which to me, like to the editors of the Rustica magazine, is the ultimate setup, because here we really play with what’s in nature and the surroundings and nothing else.

The explanation in the article is fully correct, the only thing that is missing to this schematic is that, I think, these compost bands should be oriented east-west, not north-south, south-north; to amplify the natural telluric currents and not disturb earths’ natural magnetic field.

To end the subject, while writing this I thought about a small detail, cosmic waves! from what I learned in astrophysics, this waves can all be considered like light (or electromagnetic waves). Hence, if I’m not wrong with my understanding, the various electroculture setups, allow, by amplifying the natural telluric currents or magnetic field, not only these natural fields to flow more easily but also to let cosmic waves penetrate the soil more easily.

The new green wizards

Leeks as big as the arm of a gardener, strawberries as beautiful as oranges, garlic even four times more beautiful, it’s the giant vegetable garden. The vegetable garden of electroculture, this queen of gardening with miraculous methods.

“A bulb of 800 g! This is nothing says Mr. Thévenin. It might happen once. No, what is needed is not to harvest one but hundreds. You see this square of 25 sqm, with planted garlic, the harvest will surely be of 100 kg instead of 10 compared to traditional methods.”

We were at the end of june when Mr. Thévenin told me that. End of july, at the time of harvest, I went back to see him and he wasn’t lying. The garlic plants lying on the soil sunbathing and drying. They offered bulbs from 900 g to one kilo. 100 kg of garlic on a vegetable garden of 25 sqm, Mr. Thévenin had won his bet. 800 g.. The needle of his scale stabilised and announced 800 g. To the left, in the plate a large weight, to the right in the other plate a bulb of garlic. You read that well! It was clearly a 800 g garlic bulb that Mr. Thévenin had put on his scale. It was big, five times larger than a normal garlic bulb.

Electroculture, the fairy of gardening

The author of these incredible results, this fairy of gardening, this gardening muse is called electroculture.

“So, you know!

- Yes, wires attached to a generator and then we let electrical currents flow through. It’s not natural…

- No, no…”

No, electroculture and electricity providers have nothing in common. Of course it is a matter of current, but it is not produced by a powerplant. It is in the air, in the soil, in us. This free and natural electricity has several aspects:

• The Earth’s magnetic field
  The magnetic field converges to the North Pole. Proof of this is the needle of your compass, it is constantly under its influence and indicates that direction.
• Telluric currents
  These are electric currents flowing through the earth. They move from East to West, but their path varies depending on the arrangement and the layout of terrestrial layers. According to the physicists, their intensity varies according to the months of the year. In June they are at their maximum intensity, and at their minimum in September.
• Cosmic waves
  They come from the stratosphere and penetrate the Earth’s crust.

The aim of electroculture is to pick up the electro-magnetic energies for the benefit of the plants. A vegetable thus grown grows better; its seed germinates faster; the vegetable grows faster; more easily and becomes bigger. The vegetable can also defend itself more easily against illnesses and parasites. It handles more easily periods of drought and rough soils. Indeed, this energetic influx allows the roots to go deeper into the soil to find their food and also reach deeper layers of groundwater that are inaccessible to normally cultivated plants. This energy, is naturally received by all plants: through the roots (that play a role of antennas) which pick up negative electricity from the soil and then frees it through its aerial parts (which also act as antennas). These absorb the positive atmospheric electricity. The exchange of these forces determines the growth of a plant and the proper functioning of the chlorophyll system; briefly said, it organises life thanks to the ascension of sap. Plants cultivated by electroculture hence benefit as much as possible from these energies which, if not picked up, would just be wasted. This is the theory of “electrocultivators”, although some ecologists argue that electroculture  diverts these natural beneficial forces for a whole ensemble for the profit of some privileged plants. I won’t dwell into this debate, but I believe it is necessary to be aware of these two theories. Moreover, it appears that electroculture allows foremost to reveal and produce this healthy energy. As a matter of fact, every single plant is an electrical conductor of a couple of millivolts (experiment made by connecting a voltmeter on a bean plant); in the presence of an electroculture setup the voltages are amplified.

Are you interested by electroculture, are you just discovering it today. You should know that it exists since a very long time. Ancient civilisations, the Egyptians in particular, had noticed that around certain structures or rocks, and depending on orientation, vegetation grew better and was thicker/sturdier. Researchers looked at this phenomenon and found an explanation: some rocks are rich in electropositive metals (like copper), the soil being itself naturally a carrier of negative charges, they thought that at certain locations there was a natural production of forces beneficial to plants.

So, you want to setup such a system in your vegetable garden. There are many setups available. All are prototypes (you should be able to find easily light and simple materials).

In Rustica (the name of this magazine..), we showed a couple of years ago some simple setups (see schematic A).

Nowadays the “Paulin system”, named after its inventor, is the easiest to setup for an amateur. It consists of a painted metallic antenna (plumbing pipe), headed by iron spikes, insulated (porcelain insulation recovered on ‘out of order’ electric lines, or simply a plastic bottle or any non-conducting materials placed at the base of the antenna) and stuck in the ground. A copper wire connects the antenna to a mesh of galvanized iron (standard fences..) with a length of 3 to 4 meters, depending on the parcel to cultivate and of an height of about 20 cm. This mesh is buried a few centimeters deep to facilitate the use of gardening tools. Then 2 – 3 m away, opposite to this first mesh, another mesh of the same size is placed, however this mesh is composed of an electropositive metal, for example copper or brass. It is neither connected to the other mesh, nor to the antenna (Schematic B). The whole setup is oriented so as to allow the passing through of North-South telluric currents.

Another setup (oriented North-South) consists of a straight magnet (do not use horseshoe magnets) placed underground and connected to a grid of galvanised iron placed in parallel. The positive pole (North) of the magnet is directed toward the North (see Schematic C).

For other experiments, you can also use a cage of galvanised iron mesh/grid. Bury it slightly. At the center of this vertical cylinder you plant an antenna made of a copper pipe non connected to the grid at all (Schematic D). Crops sowed or planted on the inside usually have a yield two to three times higher than traditional crops. I saw at Mr. Thévenins’ place, garlics cultivated with such a method were about 10cm taller than neighbouring traditionally cultivated ones.

Wire ‘less’ electroculture

However, the ultimate method of electroculture will in the future consist of getting rid of antennas, wires, etc. How you might ask, can we pick up the energies? By building a “natural cell”: on each side of the field to cultivate we place two bands of compost. One band is acidic (loaded with positive ions) and consisting of heathland, mash-iron, fine sand quarry, rock powder, peat, wood ash, coal dust, soot, chicken manure; the other is alkaline (lacking in positive ions, e.g. negatively charged) and consisting of tuff, limestone soil, lime, masonry plaster, manure. By the principle of communicating vessels, the alkaline body attracts the positive ions of the acidic body. A mini electric current hence results from this exchange and permeates the crops culture. Hereby stimulating the vegetation as it flows through (schematic E).

Gigantic vegetables, increased production, reduced irrigation (50 to 70%) and the economy on manure for an fully organic culture, these are the benefits of electroculture. This gardening technique from the third millennia, though born in antiquity has not finished astonishing us. We look forward to hearing from your experiments.

- Frank Benjamin (Author)

The examples speak
You want to know more about electroculture, write to: C.A.E., 17, rue des Bouvreuils, 33600 Pessac. Near Bordeaux, on an arid terrain, ungrateful, and voluntarily never irrigated, without fertilizer or manure, we cultivated barley. Here are the results:

• harvest on the control plot (no setup): 354g, 149 cobs, average number of grains per cob: 15,
• harvest on the electroculture plot: 795g, 240 cobs, average number of grains per cob: 25.
  At the beginning of our century, lieutenant Basty did experiments with potatoes on two plots of 52m².
• harvest on the control plot: 610kg of potatoes,
• harvest on the electroculture plot: 900kg.

Strawberries (culture with antennas) were harvested on May 19th, other in a traditional culture on the 3rd of June only.
An American, James Lee Scribner obtained, by plunging a bean in electromagnetic baths, a plant of 7m length. He got 72 liters of beans from that giant.
In France, a plant of potatoes cultivated in electroculture attained 2m height and produced more than 4kgs of tubers of prime quality (he received the 1st prize at the National agricultural competition of Versailles in 1977). This plant kept on producing while others (normal culture) were already withered since a long time. In Pithiviers, M.Marcel Thévenin harvested a plant of tomatoes (in a galvanized iron mesh with antenna system) of more than 2m height, loaded with very big and delicious fruits.
In Ruwanda (Africa), drought and hunger prevails. Under the drive of Père Tasse, the villagers using electroculture managed to cultivate tomatoes, mil and sweet potatoes.

Experiments from the 20-02-2013

Experiments done on two colonies of Myrmica sabuleti; test with 10 workers of each colony.

Observations

A couple of seconds after the DECT Phone base was turned on, the workers started moving differently (more slowly, hesitant, even seeming to have some difficulties). They gradually started to move away from just above where the DECT Phone antenna was located and the ones that went in direction to that zone evidently looked like they tried to avoid it (changing direction and even walking backward).

Adding one orgonite (TB) didn’t seem to change much. We then added 5 more orgonites (TBs/ITBs). Soon after, the workers started to move a little bit faster, more easily, less hesitant and some ants were observed even above the zone where the antenna was located. There seemed to be a rather large variability of reaction/behaviour between different ants.

Half an hour after having switched off the DECT, ants moved again as previously, at a normal speed, without hesitation and going easily anywhere and above where the active antenna was previously.

Linear velocity (mm/sec) et angular (deg. ang./cm) (median and quartiles) of the 20 ants, which trajectories were followed under the three experimental conditions.

The values of the linear velocity and angular velocities appropriately describe what happened:

• Lower linear velocity and higher angular velocity with the presence of the powered on DECT Phone
• Intermediate linear velocity and angular velocity (compared to control ones) with the presence of the powered on DECT Phone and 5 adjacent orgonites
• Larger variability of obtained values with DECT and orgonites compared to control values

• Orgonites clearly seem to have an effect, but they don’t remove all the harmful effects cause by the electromagnetic fields generated by the DECT Phone. The ants (except a couple) still detect the presence of the harmful field.
• Humans (not all!) are less sensitive than ants and could hence feel relieved or more at ease with the presence or orgonites. However, these orgonites are (in my opinion) not sufficient enough to overcome the negative effects of zones with a dense coverage; withmany wireless modems in corridors, large numbers of electromagnetic emitters (WiFi etc.) placed in the same room etc.

Videos (In french..)

Join in the debate on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/resonancebeingsoffrequency

Contact the film makers at james@flatfrogfilms.com

RESONANCE is a sensational eye opening documentary which reveals the harm we are doing by existing in an ocean of man made wireless frequencies.

Two billion years ago life first arrived on this planet; a planet, which was filled with a natural frequency. As life slowly evolved, it did so surrounded by this frequency. and Inevitably, it began tuning in.

By the time mankind arrived on earth an incredible relationship had been struck; a relationship that science is just beginning to comprehend.

Research is showing that being exposed to this frequency is absolutely integral to us. It controls our mental and physical health, it synchronizes our circadian rhythms, and it aids our immune system and improves our sense of wellbeing.

Not only are we surrounded by natural frequencies, our bodies are filled with them too. Our cells communicate using electro magnetic frequencies. Our brain emits a constant stream of frequencies and our DNA delivers instructions, using frequency waves. Without them we couldn’t exist for more than a second.

This delicate balance has taken billions of years to perfect. But over the last 25 years the harmony has been disturbed. and disturbed dramatically.

Mankind has submerged itself in an ocean of artificial frequencies. They are all around us, filling the air and drowning out the earth’s natural resonance.

To the naked eye the planet appears to be the same. But at a cellular level it is the biggest change that life on earth has endured; the affects of which we are just starting to see and feel.