Here is a non-exhaustive list of scientific publications on the subject and the general conclusions of these publications.
You can read the full study by clicking on it, except for the non-free ones, the link will redirect you to the site where they are available.

Almost none of these publications clearly incriminate radiations, but there is much suspicion of the effects of artificial microwaves on living beings. Some papers question microwaves, but often at higher powers than recommended by global exposure standards.
That said, these studies clearly show that there is a lot of evidence indicating that prolonged exposure to microwaves can cause DNA damage (human and non-human), which is often reversible if the exposure stops, thanks to the mechanisms of self-regeneration of living beings.
But for living beings with weak immunity, this self-regeneration can be compromised and considering that it is hard, in the real world, to stop this exposure, it is sometimes not possible.
Some studies observe effects, but conclude that they are not considered significant.

At low levels of exposure, there are more publications on human and subjective feelings. However, these feelings all go in the same direction: increased irritability, symptoms of fatigue, headache, weakened immunity, etc. when microwaves sources are closer.

There are also statistical studies covering more than 10 years indicating that there are very clearly incidences of increased biological effects, but unfortunately there is not enough data to prove it scientifically and with certainty.

Effects of artificial microwaves on living beings

DNA fragmentation in human fibroblasts under extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure
Our data confirm that intermittent (but not continuous) exposure of human primary fibroblasts to a 50 Hz EMF at a flux density of 1 mT induces a slight but significant increase of DNA fragmentation in the Comet assay, and we provide first evidence for this to be caused by the magnetic rather than the electric field. Moreover, we show that EMF-induced responses in the Comet assay are dependent on cell proliferation, suggesting that processes of DNA replication rather than the DNA itself may be affected.

Cell Type-Dependent Induction of DNA Damage by 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Does Not Result in Significant Cellular Dysfunctions
RF-EMF induces DNA damage in a cell type-dependent manner, but the elevated γH2AX foci formation in HSF cells does not result in significant cellular dysfunctions.

The effect of electromagnetic fields on oxidative DNA damage
The results of the study showed that extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields enhanced the effect of oxidative stress on DNA damage and supported the idea obtained from the previous studies on an increasing effect of electromagnetic fields on the concentration and the life-time of free radicals.

Preliminary report: Symptoms associated with mobile phone use
Following isolated reports of headache-like symptoms arising in some users, a survey has been conducted to characterize the symptoms sometimes associated with mobile phone usage. … There were several reports suggestive of intra-cranial effects. … Cranial and other diverse symptoms may arise associated with mobile phone usage. Physicians and users alike should be alert to this. Further work is needed to determine the range of effects, their mechanism and the possible implications for safety limits of RFR.

Prevalence of Headache among Handheld Cellular Telephone Users in Singapore: A Community Study
We carried out a cross-sectional community study in Singapore to determine the prevalence of specific central nervous system (CNS) symptoms among handheld cellular telephone (HP) users compared to nonusers and to study the association of risk factors and CNS symptoms among HP users. … Headache was the most prevalent symptom among HP users compared to non-HP users, with an adjusted prevalence rate ratio of 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.70]. There is a significant increase in the prevalence of headache with increasing duration of usage (in minutes per day). Prevalence of headache was reduced by more than 20% among those who used hand-free equipment for their cellular telephones as compared to those who never use the equipment. The use of HPs is not associated with a significant increase of CNS symptoms other than headache.

Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use
Thirty-one percent of the respondents in Norway and 13% of those in Sweden had experienced at least one symptom in connection with MP use. Next to the sensations of warmth on the ear and behind/around the ear, burning sensations in the facial skin and headaches were most commonly reported. Most symptoms usually began during or within half an hour after the call and lasted for up to 2 h. Relatively few had consulted a physician or been on sick leave because of the symptoms, but about 45% among those with an MP attributed symptom had taken steps to reduce the symptom. These results suggest an awareness of the symptoms, but not necessarily a serious health problem.

Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations
Despite very low exposure to HF-EMF, effects on wellbeing and performance cannot be ruled out, as shown by recently obtained experimental results; however, mechanisms of action at these low levels are unknown.

Mobile Telephone Base-Stations: Effects on Health and Wellbeing
Despite influences of confounding variables, including fear of adverse effects, a significant relation to measured power-density was found for cardiovascular symptoms and perceptual speed.
This pilot study was explorative, hence no far reaching conclusions can be drawn. However, effects on wellbeing and performance of very low levels of exposure to emissions from base-stations cannot be ruled out and should further be studied.

The Microwave Syndrome: A Preliminary Study in Spain
The present results demonstrate a significant correlation between several symptoms of what is called microwave sickness and the microwave power density associated with the Base Station located on a hill at the edge of the town. The severity of the symptoms weakens for people who live far away, at a distance greater than 250m from the main. EMF source and at a power density lower than 0.1 μW/cm 2. …
There is a large and coherent body of evidence of biological mechanisms that support the conclusion of a plausible, logical, and causal relationship between RF exposure and neurological disease. Hence it is possible that cell sites are causing adverse health effects. Public health surveys of people living in the vicinity of cell site BSs should be carried out immediately, and continued over the next 2 decades. Prompt effects such as miscarriage, cardiac disruption, sleep disturbance, and chronic fatigue could well be early indicators of adverse health effects.

The Microwave Syndrome: Further aspects of a spanish study
The adjusted (sex, age, distance) logistic regression model showed statistically significant positive exposure-response associations between the E-field and the following variables: fatigue, irritability, headaches, nausea, loss of appetite, sleeping disorder, depressive tendency, feeling of discomfort, difficulty in concentration, loss of memory, visual disorder, dizziness and cardiovascular problems. The inclusion of the distance, which might be a proxy for the sometimes raised “concerns explanation”, did not alter the model substantially. These results support the first statistical analysis based on two groups … Based on the data of this study the advice would be to strive for levels not higher than 0.02 V/m for the sum total, which is equal to a power density of 0.0001 μW/cm2 or 1 μW/m2, which is the indoor exposure value for GSM base stations proposed on empirical evidence by the Public Health Office of the Government of Salzburg in 2002.

Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz (Bavaria, Germany) – Evidence of a Dose-Response Relationship
With the Federal Immission Control Ordinance (26. BlmSchV), the federal regulation maker establishes exposure limit regulations for electromagnetic fields whose specifications are required by acts and the constitution. But as the presented paper shows once more, a clearly increasing incidence of disease is already taking place far below legally binding exposure guideline limits.
Even if in legal terms, this is not yet proof for an individual-specific evidence of damage, the presented investigations make it clear that the conclusions drawn by the federal regulation maker from the results of the German Mobile Phone Programme, according to which no health risk is to be expected below the exposure limits of the 26. BlmSchV, are scientifically and legally unjustifiable.
From a legal perspective, it should be noted here that the current exposure limit regulations basically do not provide sufficient protection against health risks. Insofar as official agencies still suggest that the exposure limits of the 26. BlmSchV would be precautionary limits, these limits are now disproven – among others – through our investigation, as it showed a significantly increased health risk in the vicinity of cell phone base stations.

Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations
Inhabitants living nearby mobile phone base stations are at risk for developing neuropsychiatric problems and some changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions either by facilitation or inhibition. So, revision of standard guidelines for public exposure to RER from mobile phone base station antennas and using of NBTB for regular assessment and early detection of biological effects among inhabitants around the stations are recommended.

How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones affect human hormone profiles?
This study showed significant decrease in volunteers’ ACTH, cortisol, thyroid hormones, prolactin for young females, and testosterone levels.
The present study revealed high RFR effects on pituitary–adrenal axis.

Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations, Influences of distance and sex
Comparisons of complaint frequencies (CHI-SQUARE test with Yates correction) in relation to the distance from base stations and sex show significant (p <0.05) increase as compared to people living > 300 m or not exposed to base stations, up through 300 m for tiredness, 200 m for headache, sleep disruption, discomfort, etc., 100 m for irritability, depression, loss of memory, dizziness, libido decrease, etc. Women significantly more often than men (p < 0.05) complained of headache, nausea, loss of appetite, sleep disruption, depression, discomfort and visual disrupti ons. This first study on symptoms experienced by people living in the vicinity of base stations shows that, in view of radioprotection, the of minimal distance of people from cellular phone base stations should not be < 300 m.

Sleep Disturbances in the Vicinity of the Short-Wave Broadcast Transmitter Schwarzenburg
The series of studies gives strong evidence of a causal relationship between operation of a short-wave radio transmitter and sleep disturbances in the surrounding population, but there is insufficient evidence to distinguish clearly between a biological and a psychological effect.

Changes of Clinically Important Neurotransmitters under the Influence of Modulated RF Fields – A Long-term Study under Real-life Conditions
This follow-up of 60 participants over one and a half years shows a significant effect on the adrenergic system after the installation of a new cell phone base station in the village of Rimbach (Bavaria).
After the activation of the GSM base station, the levels of the stress hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline increased significantly during the first six months; the levels of the precursor dopamine decreased substantially. The initial levels were not restored even after one and a half years. As an indicator of the dysregulated chronic imbalance of the stress system, the phenylethylamine (PEA) levels dropped significantly until the end of the study period.
The effects showed a dose-response relationship and occurred well below current limits for technical RF radiation exposures. Chronic dysregulation of the catecholamine system has great relevance for health and is well known to damage human health in the long run.

Increased incidence of cancer near a cell-phone transmitter station
The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is an increased cancer incidence in populations, living in a small area, and exposed to RF radiation from a cell-phone transmitter station. … The study indicates an association between increased incidence of cancer and living in proximity to a cell-phone transmitter station.

Non-thermal effects and mechanisms of interaction between electromagnetic fields and living matter
This book provide updated information concerning mechanism of interaction between non ionising radiation fields and living matter, with particular reference to potential non-thermal toxic effects.
The scientific knowledge available today regarding electromagnetic fields remains limited. Nevertheless, on the basis of recent epidemiological studies, and while awaiting new experimental data, it is advisable to limit exposure to electromagnetic fields as much as possible. This is especially true for children and adolescents, the most vulnerable segments of the population, and has been recommended by both the Swedish and UK health authorities.

Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment.
Obviously, biologically based exposure standards are needed to prevent disruption of normal body processes and potential adverse health effects of chronic exposure. Based on this review, as well as the reviews in the recent Bioinitiative Report … , it must be concluded that the existing public safety limits are inadequate to protect public health, and that new public safety limits, as well as limits on further deployment of untested technologies, are warranted.

Radiofrequency and Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Effects on the Blood-Brain Barrier
Possible mechanisms for the interactions between electromagnetic fields and the living organisms are discussed. Demonstrated effects on the blood-brain barrier, as well as a series of other effects upon biology, have caused societal anxiety. Continued research is needed to come to an understanding of how these possible effects can be neutralized, or at least reduced. Furthermore, it should be kept in mind that proven effects on biology also should have positive potentials, e.g., for medical use.

The Mammalian Brain in the Electromagnetic Fields Designed by Man with Special Reference to Blood-Brain Barrier Function, Neuronal Damage and Possible Physical Mechanisms
Even if many studies have seen no effects of the EMFs upon biology, an abundance of scientific reports in respected journals have shown significant, though often weak, effects upon cells in vitro, in experimental animals and also in humans. … If the man made EMFs, such as those utilized in mobile communication, even at extremely low SAR values, causes the users’ own albumin to leak out through the BBB, which is meant to protect the brain, also other unwanted and toxic molecules in the blood, may leak into the brain tissue. There they concentrate in, and damage, the neurones and glial cells of the brain according to our studies. It cannot be excluded that this, (especially after many years intense use) may promote the development of autoimmune and neuro-degenerative diseases!

(Original language: German) Synergistic effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields in combination with carcinogenic substances – co-carcinogenicity or tumor promotion?
The results clearly and with great statistical significance show that the DNA was not more damaged by the electromagnetic fields in any of the tissues examined than in the tissues of non-exposed animals. According to these findings, the carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields in the frequency range of the UMTS standard can be excluded as the cause of the results observed earlier. Therefore, further studies must now clarify which mechanisms of action are responsible for tumor promotion.

Biological effects of electromagnetic fields
In conclusion, the use of different sources of electro-magnetic fields, have caused great contradictions in the international literature where experiments are not always reproducible, so the topic of biological responses to electromagnetic fields is viewed with great skepticism. There still is a need for further elucidation of the role of ELF in biological and medical systems.

Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR – in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR – are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to:
1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations.
2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects.

The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields
1. Well replicated studies have shown that weak electromagnetic fields remove calcium ions bound to the membranes of living cells, making them more likely to tear, develop temporary pores and leak.
2. DNAase (an enzyme that destroys DNA) leaking through the membranes of lysosomes (small bodies in living cells packed with digestive enzymes) explains the fragmentation of DNA seen in cells exposed to mobile phone signals.
When this occurs in the germ line (the cells that give rise to eggs and sperm), it reduces fertility and predicts genetic damage in future generations.
3. Leakage of calcium ions into the cytosol (the main part of the cell) acts as a metabolic stimulant, which accounts for reported accelerations of growth and healing, but it also promotes the growth of tumours.
4. Leakage of calcium ions into neurones (brain cells) generates spurious action potentials (nerve impulses) accounting for pain and other neurological symptoms in electrosensitive individuals. It also degrades the signal to noise ratio of the brain making it less likely to respond adequately to weak stimuli. This may be partially responsible the increased accident rate of drivers using mobile phones.
5. A more detailed examination of the molecular mechanisms explains many of the seemingly weird characteristics of electromagnetic exposure, e.g. why weak fields are more effective than strong ones, why some frequencies such as 16Hz are especially potent and why pulsed fields do more damage.
…
However, it seems possible that at least some cases electrosensitivity could be due to low levels of ionised calcium in the blood exacerbating the electromagnetic effects. If so, it may be possible to relieve some or all of the symptoms by conventional treatment for hypocalcemia.

Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use
This study confirmed previous results of an association between mobile and cordless phone use and malignant brain tumours. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that RF-EMFs play a role both in the initiation and promotion stages of carcinogenesis.

Mobile phones, cordless phones and rates of brain tumors in different age groups in the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Swedish Cancer Register during 1998-2015
The results indicate underreporting of brain tumor cases to the Cancer Register. The real incidence would be higher. Thus, incidence trends based on the Cancer Register should be used with caution. Use of wireless phones should be considered in relation to the change of incidence rates.

IEEE Microwave 2018/09-10 – Clear Evidence of Cell-Phone RF Radiation Cancer Risk
Malignant schwannoma in rat hearts were the most salient findings from the NTP RF bioassay. Acoustic schwannomas in human brains and malignant schwannomas in rat hearts were independently observed from two different body tissues in humans and rats.
There could actually be a link between Schwann cells that wrap around both nerve tissues in the heart and along the auditory nervous system.
…
Now that the NTP review panel has concluded there is clear evidence of carcinogenicity from long-term RF exposure in rats, is it conceivable that the IARC would upgrade its epidemiology-based classification of RF exposure to the next level of carcinogenicity to humans?

Effects of artificial microwaves on insects and animals

Oxidative DNA damage in rats exposed to extremely low frequency electro magnetic fields
Our results showed that the exposure to ELF-EMF induced oxidative DNA damage and lipid peroxidation (LPO).

Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation.
Effects on cognitive functions were evaluated in the episodic-like memory test. In our study, GSM exposed rats had impaired memory for objects and their temporal order of presentation, compared to sham exposed controls (P = 0.02). Detecting the place in which an object was presented was not affected by GSM exposure. Our results suggest significantly reduced memory functions in rats after GSM microwave exposure (P = 0.02).

Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication
The exposure was 915 MHz microwaves either pulse modulated (PW) at 217 Hz with 0.57 ms pulse width, at 50 Hz with 6.6 ms pulse width or continuous wave (CW). The frequency of pathological rats (0.17) among controls in the various groups is not significantly different. The frequency of pathological rats was 170/481 (0.35 ± 0.03) among rats exposed to pulse modulated (PW) and 74/149 (0.50 ± 0.07) among rats exposed to continuous wave exposure (CW). These results are both highly significantly different to their corresponding controls (p < 0.0001) and the frequency of pathological rats after exposure to pulsed radiation (PW) is significantly less (p < 0.002) than after exposure to continuous radiation (CW).

Increased blood–brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone
Albumin extravasation was enhanced in the mobile phone exposed rats as compared to sham controls after this 7-day recovery period (Fisher’s exact probability test, p = 0.04 and Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.012), at the SAR-value of 12 mW/kg (Mann–Whitney, p = 0.007) and with a trend of increased albumin extravasation also at the SAR-values of 0.12 mW/kg and 120 mW/kg. There was a low, but significant correlation between the exposure level (SAR-value) and occurrence of focal albumin extravasation (r s = 0.33; p = 0.04).
The present findings are in agreement with our earlier studies where we have seen increased BBB permeability immediately and 14 days after exposure. We here discuss the present findings as well as the previous results of altered BBB permeability from our and other laboratories.

Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones
Three groups each of eight rats were exposed for 2 hr to Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) mobile phone electromagnetic fields of different strengths. We found highly significant (p < 0.002) evidence for neuronal damage in the cortex, hippocampus, and basal ganglia in the brains of exposed rats.

Non-thermal effects of EMF upon the mammalian brain
If mobile communication, even at extremely low SAR values, causes the users ́ own albumin to leak out through the BBB, which is meant to protect the brain, also other unwanted and toxic molecules in the blood, may leak into the brain tissue and concentrate in and damage the neurones and glial cells of the brain. It can not be excluded that this, (especially after many years intense use) may promote the development of autoimmune and neuro-degenerative diseases, and we conclude that the suppliers of mobile communication – and our politicians – have an extensive responsibility to support the exploration of these possible risks for the users and the society. This is especially true for the new and hitherto barely examined 3G technique which sends microwaves of a different character, and it is quite possible that the biological effects of 3G differ from those of GSM.

Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in b6c3f1/n mice exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (1,900 mhz) and modulations (gsm and cdma) used by cell phones
There were higher rates of survival in males at the low (2.5 W/kg) and mid (5 W/kg) exposures to CDMA- and GSM-modulated RFR, respectively. Body weights in the exposed groups of animals were similar to their controls. In both studies (GSM and CDMA), there were higher incidences of malignant lymphoma in all groups of female mice exposed to RFR compared to controls. However, the incidences in all of the exposed females were within the range historically observed in this strain of mouse in other NTP studies. There were higher incidences of skin and lung tumors in males exposed to the highest two levels of GSM-modulated RFR (5 and 10 W/kg), and of liver tumors at the mid-dose (5 W/kg) of CDMA-modulated RFR.
Conclusions: For GSM-modulated RFR, we conclude that exposure to RFR may have caused tumors in the skin and lungs of male mice and malignant lymphomas in female mice. For CDMA-modulated RFR, we conclude that exposure to RFR may have caused tumors in the liver of male mice and malignant lymphomas in female mice.

Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Hsd:Sprague Dawley sd rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (gsm and cdma) used by cell phones
In males for both GSM- and CDMA-modulated RFR, we conclude that exposures increased the number of animals with tumors in the heart. Tumors of the brain were also considered to be related to exposure; and increased numbers of male rats with tumors of the adrenal gland were also related to exposure. We are uncertain whether occurrences of prostate gland, pituitary gland, and pancreatic islet tumors in male rats exposed to GSM-modulated RFR and pituitary gland and liver tumors in male rats exposed to CDMA-modulated RFR were related to RFR exposures. This was also the case with female rats, where we conclude that exposure to GSM- or CDMA-modulated RFR may have been related to tumors in the heart. For females exposed to CDMA-modulated RFR, occurrences of brain and adrenal gland tumors may have been related to exposure.

Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission
A statistically significant increase in the incidence of heart Schwannomas was observed in treated male rats at the highest dose (50 V/m). Furthermore, an increase in the incidence of heart Schwann cells hyperplasia was observed in treated male and female rats at the highest dose (50 V/m), although this was not statistically significant. An increase in the incidence of malignant glial tumors was observed in treated female rats at the highest dose (50 V/m), although not statistically significant.
The RI findings on far field exposure to RFR are consistent with and reinforce the results of the NTP study on near field exposure, as both reported an increase in the incidence of tumors of the brain and heart in RFR-exposed Sprague-Dawley rats. These tumors are of the same histotype of those observed in some epidemiological studies on cell phone users. These experimental studies provide sufficient evidence to call for the re-evaluation of IARC conclusions regarding the carcinogenic potential of RFR in humans.

Mobile Phone Mast Effects on Common Frog (Rana temporaria) Tadpoles: The City Turned into a Laboratory
These results indicate that radiation emitted by phone masts in a real situation may affect the development and may cause an increase in mortality of exposed tadpoles. This research may have huge implications for the natural world, which is now exposed to high microwave radiation levels from a multitude of phone masts.

The incidence of electromagnetic pollution on the amphibian decline: Is this an important piece of the puzzle?
Electromagnetic pollution (in the microwaveand in the radiofrequency range) is a possible cause for deformations and decline of some amphibianpopulations. Keeping in mind that amphibians are reliable bio-indicators, it is of great importance tocarry out studies on the effects of this new type of contamination.

Changes in honeybee behaviour and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations
We have compared the performance of honeybees in cellphone radiation exposed and unexposed colonies. A significant (p < 0.05) decline in colony strength and in the egg laying rate of the queen was observed. The behaviour of exposed foragers was negatively influenced by the exposure, there was neither honey nor pollen in the colony at the end of the experiment.

BEES, BIRDS AND MANKIND Destroying Nature by ‘Electrosmog’
To summarise, we can answer the question as to whether subjective reports of illness have an objective basis as follows: The redox balanceis disturbed via the direct influence of weak magnetic and electromagnetic fields on the NADH oxidase. The result is oxidative/nitrosative stress. It leads to disruptions and prevention of vital functions. In the course of these processes, exactly those disease symptoms subjectively described by those affected and exposed to radiated fields, are in evidence.
The various problems disappear if the influence of the radiation or the ROS/RNS formation is “switched off” (e.g. ABELIN 1999, ABELIN et al. 1995, HORNIG et al. 2001, PETROV1970, TNO study 2004).
Health is not, however, restored if the disruptions have already led to serious damage such as DNA destruction or tumours.

Effects of artificial microwaves on plants

Review: Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants
Our analysis demonstrates that the data from a substantial amount of the studies on RF-EMFs from mobile phones show physiological and/or morphological effects (89.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, our analysis of the results from these reported studies demonstrates that the maize, roselle, pea, fenugreek, duckweeds, tomato, onions and mungbean plants seem to be very sensitive to RF-EMFs. Our findings also suggest that plants seem to be more responsive to certain frequencies, especially the frequencies between (i) 800 and 1500 MHz (p < 0.0001), (ii) 1500 and 2400 MHz (p < 0.0001) and (iii) 3500 and 8000 MHz (p = 0.0161)

Radio frequency electromagnetic field (900 MHz) induces oxidative damage to DNA and biomembrane in tobacco shoot cells (Nicotiana tabacum)
These results suggest that short-term exposure to 900 MHz EMF has genotoxic effect but harshly interrupts plasma biomembrane integrity as well. Plant model system proved to be sensitive biomarkers of RF-EMF exposure.

This article was originally published on the Brother Jonathan Gazette on the 5th of December 2005
by Marshall Smith
newseditor@brojon.com

http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/the_tamiflu_myth.html

With the original title: What Big Pharma and the CDC Forgot to Tell the Doctors.
But the page does not exists anymore and this information is still vital and often still unknown to most people!
note: Temperatures are in Farenheit on this document.

Tamiflu was developed several years ago after lab tests showed it slowed the replication of viruses in the lab dish. Tests in humans showed it reduced the normal 5 to 7 day course of Flu by 1.5 to 2.5 days. It did not prevent, cure nor reduce the effects of Flu. At best it is a palliative or pain reliever to “treat the symptoms,” but not cure to the disease.

Most medical doctors mistakenly believe in the “anti-body” response of the immune system as the method by which the body fights viral infections. But not so. The body causes a fever above 101 degrees which stops the telomeres on the ends of the virus from allowing any viral replication.

The fever is the human or mammalian body’s primary generalized immune system response to any viral infection. Any palliative treatment which reduces the fever of flu infections will prolong the infection and may lead to irreparable damage or death, mostly from the resulting viral pneumonia. But the pneumonia was caused by lowering the fever and allowing uncontrolled viral replication in the lungs. Most cold and flu medications, including aspirin and Tamiflu are in this palliative class.

In the last two years, doctors have been treating patients who have H5N1 Bird Flu. The results are that 50% or half of the treated patients die of viral pneumonia. Were the deaths caused by a “new” more virulent strain of Bird Flu or was it the “new” use of a new anti-viral called Tamiflu? A good doctor would know the difference.

Solving the Problem of Viral Infections

Recently a BroJon Digest reader, named Doreen, wrote to ask some of the questions which were also asked by hundreds of other readers. She wrote:

“I read your article about the “Bird Flu”, and had a couple questions for you. First, are you a scientist? Second, while your article seems informative (and I agree with your conclusions that the so-called Pandemic is a major scam), I do not get enough information about the difference between Reproduction and Replication, concerning bacteria (reproduce) and virus (replicate)… replicate reminds me of Star Trek, and the replicators on the Enterprise! If you cannot explain the difference for me, can you refer me to a site that can?”

Very good questions. Yes, I am a senior scientist. I have multiple university degrees. I spent several decades working as a senior scientist/engineer for NASA. One of my NASA projects was the rat and monkey biological experiment which flew on the Shuttle Challenger in 1985. I worked directly with astronaut/scientist Dr. Robert Obermeyer. I worked in the ultra-clean lab, testing the cages and data-instrumentation which I built for the experiment, while Bob Obermeyer took the animals in the surgical room and implanted the animals with tiny transmitters which were then recorded on my computer system.

I have long been a medical researcher, but I don’t have a medical degree nor license. Thus I don’t see things the way most doctors do. One of the things with which I disagree with most, compared to the medical profession is how viruses replicate and infect cells.

Using my degrees in physics and engineering, I studied the surface coatings of viruses. That is how I discovered that the replication of viruses is a very close analog of sexual reproduction. I have not seen that written in any medical textbooks nor journal articles, so, Doreen, I can’t direct you to any websites for more information. So I will explain it to you as best I can.

The Big Difference Between Bacteria and Viruses – What Most Doctors Never Learned in Medical School

Bacteria are large single-celled animals which are large enough to be seen in a microscope. The bacteria is a protein bag enclosing a fluid which mimics sea water in saltiness and acidity. This reflects the fact that all animal and plant lifeforms on earth formed in the salty ocean of earth. Now, all animal cells carry their salty ocean internally. This cytoplasmic cell fluid contains many parts, including the nucleus of the cell which is very similar to a virus, and many primitive small sub-bacteria which are in each cell, called by such names as mitochondria and golgi-apparatus among others.

These sub-parts are very simple separate bacteria-like bodies which have specific functions in the cell such as collecting oxygen or actually doing the breathing, and other parts which take the sugar, fat and proteins in the blood stream and as they transfer into the cell fluid they are converted into food and energy for each cell. Thus, bacteria are living cells which, (1) can move, (2) can locate and eat food, combining the food and oxygen to make energy, and (3) can reproduce by making copies of each cell by dividing down the middle and making two new identical cells from the original one.

But, unlike bacterial cells, viruses are not alive. They cannot do anything which cells or bacteria can do. All viruses have only two simple parts, (1) a single long strand of a molcule called DNA which may have millions of atoms in the long string, and (2) an outer layer of protective protein bag material, which is made up of the broken parts of the cellular or bacterial protein bag from which the virus last escaped. Viruses are not alive and cannot grow their own protein bag coating. Viruses are so much more tiny than are cells, being made only of a single string of atoms, they cannot be seen with a normal microscope. They can only be seen with electron microscopes.

The DNA strand in the middle of the virus is a long string of connected single sugar molecules called Ribose. Onto each and every Ribose sugar molecule is then attached an amino acid. This process of making DNA can only occur inside a host bacteria cell which has a large supply of free amino acids floating in the salty cytoplasmic fluid. There are about 17 amino acids in the proteins which humans eat, but only 4 critical amino acids are used to make DNA. The banding or repeating pattern of the 4 amino acids, like a string of colored beads, is used to make partial copies of sections of the DNA to make protein-string hormones which control how cells operate and reproduce. These partial protein copies of small sections of the DNA molecule, are actually hormones which communicate with and control other cells, and are what make the cells of your body grow and live.

How Your Body Uses Viral-Type DNA Molecules — How DNA Is Used As a Normal Part of Making Your Body Work

The DNA molecules in your cells are similar to a virus DNA, but with several differences. The DNA in your cells are made of two parallel long strands which are electrically bonded together. Over simplifying how they are put together, you could say one half of the double strand came from your mother and the other half came from your father. The two halves are bonded together to make a diploid or complete double strand which makes a compete animal or plant DNA molecule found in the nucleus of all living cells. But the viral DNA is only half of the long double string molecule, it does not have a mother nor father. It only makes repeated identical copies of the original half or haploid molecule itself. Thus the virus cannot “reproduce” in the same way cells do.

But your body actually does the same thing. When a woman ovulates she causes complete cells, which normally divide in half, to instead divide into four parts in her ovaries to divide the original double strand DNA molecule into four single strand ova. Each ovum is a half or haploid version of your original DNA. The normal reproduction of all the cells in your body simply divide into two exact diploid copies. This process is called Mitosis and occurs in almost all of your cells every week or so. But once a month in women, certain cells in the ovary divide by a unique process called Meiosis which causes the cells to divide into four identical parts. But each new primitive cell has only half of the normal DNA strand. Each haploid cell is an ovum, and has the same atomic and molecular single-strand structure as a virus DNA.

The same thing occurs each month in men, when the sperm are made by dividing a body DNA molecule into four to make four haploid or half DNA molecules, which is all that is inside a sperm body. Neither ova nor sperm are living cells. They can’t reproduce by themselves. They are each more like a single haploid DNA virus. By sexual reproduction, which is almost exactly the same as a virus entering a cell, the haploid or half DNA from mother and father are combined into a diploid or full double DNA strand thus producing a new living cell, destined to become a new human being. Viruses don’t do that. They simply keep making exact copies of the original haploid or half DNA. They are not alive. They cannot grow or mutate from one form of bird flu into another. They are more like inanimate crystals, which can only copy more crystals. They don’t grow and mutate. Also, just like a sperm entering through the unique cell wall of an ovum, which is specific to each species, meaning a cow sperm cannot enter into a sheep ovum, a virus cannot enter into just any other cell which has a protein coating different from the coating on the original virus. That’s why humans can’t get bird flu.

The set of the specific four amino acids which are used to make DNA are called Nucleic Acids when they attach along the long strand of sugar Ribose molecules. When they are attached they are called Ribo-Nucleic Acids. When the whole long strand of millions of RiboNucleic Acids have completely attached from one end of the long chain to the other, it releases an Oxygen atom at the end of the string, carrying away an electron, and then the whole chain is stuck or bonded together by electrical forces. The release of the Oxygen atom is called Deoxyfication. This whole long chain, when it is completely filled, and then de-oxyfied is called De-oxy-ribo Nucleic Acid, or as we know it, DNA.

That is also all that a virus is. Just a long chain of millions of the four amino acids all stuck together in a certain pattern. The only difference between the millions of types of viruses, is the repeating bead-like patterns of the four amino acids along the chain. The virus DNA cannot move by itself, it cannot locate, breath and eat food, and it cannot divide in half and make copies of itself or reproduce the way bacterial cells do. A Virus does not fit the definition of a living thing. It is more like the repeating patterns of atoms in a crystal.

How Your Cells Use DNA to Reproduce But Viruses Can Only Replicate – The Mystery of Viral Replication Explained

The only thing that a virus does is a process called Replication. When a virus enters one of your cells, it escapes from within its own old protein surface coating and it stretches out into a long string. The viral DNA then collects millions of free amino acids floating in your salty cell fluid to make a mirror image copy of the four types of amino acids in the viral chain. This reversed mirror image chain is called Retro-deoxy-ribo Nucleic Acid or shortened to RNA. The RNA molecule is special and continues to make another mirror image of itself which is, of course, an exact copy of the original viral DNA. This unique method of making a mirror image of a mirror image to make an exact copy of the original viral DNA is the only method a virus can use to make copies. This is called Replication.

The RNA molecule string will then continue to make many, many copies which result in the original viral DNA now having thousands of exact duplicate DNA copies all made from the amino acids stolen from your cell fluid. This starves your cell of all the amino acids and in a matter of minutes, destroys it. The original virus and its many replicate copies are now free to invade your other body cells.

But before leaving the infected cell, the thousands of new viral DNA copies then steal pieces of the protein bag coating from your damaged and dying cell, and then covers the viral DNA with stolen cell wall material. This is the trick by which the virus can exist in your body. By covering itself with the old cell wall from your own cells, the virus then hides from your immune system, since the virus now looks like just one of your own friendly cells and not a dangerous foreign virus.

How A Single Virus May Seem To Be Hundreds of Different Types – The Difference Between Types H5N1 and H3N2 is the Stolen Surface Coat

This means that any certain virus may have many different surface coatings, depending on where it last came from. If it last came from a bird, it is a bird virus and can only infect birds. If the same virus had escaped from a pig or hog, then it is a porcine or pig virus. It is almost impossible for humans to get viruses from horses, dogs, birds or snakes.

Unfortunately, it is quite easy for humans to get viruses from pigs, because of the strange similarity in the tissue typing of pig and human tissue. The atomic structure of the surface coat on pig viruses are similar enough that the pig virus can enter human cells. This is why cell tissue from pigs, such as heart valves, pancreatic insulin and other body parts from pigs can be used in humans. Oddly, it is hard for viruses from our closest mammalian neighbors, the chimps and gorillas, to enter into humans. Simian viruses simply are not close enough with the same cell surface types as human viruses.

That is about as clear as I can explain Viral Replication. It is the process of the copying of atoms and molecules of DNA and RNA in a specific order. It has nothing to do with the dividing and splitting or Reproduction of living cells or beings.

The trick here, Doreen, is that for the viral RNA to make many, many replica copies of the original DNA virus, the viral RNA molecule must detach and release each new DNA copy into the cell fluid, to open up all the atomic connecting spaces along the chain of the long RNA molecule, in order to make room for the next new copy.

How To Instantly Stop The Viral Replication Process – Why Mammals are Different from Reptiles and Birds

What causes the RNA copy to completely release the newly made copy, and unzip the new DNA virus from the RNA master copy is something at the end of the molecule chain, called a telomere. When the DNA copy is complete, the electrical charge on the RNA Telomere changes, like flipping an electrical switch, and it then releases and repels the new DNA copy by electrical forces. But the RNA Telomere is temperature sensitive, it won’t release a new copy if it is too warm.

If the temperature of the Telomere on the end of the RNA chain is too hot — meaning above 102 degrees F, then the Telomere cannot unzip and release the new DNA copy. The RNA and the new DNA viral copy are electrically bonded together — and they are stuck — they can’t unzip and separate. Thus, the original viral DNA cannot replicate even one copy of itself using the RNA if you have a fever of about 101 to 102 degrees. That is why humans and all warm-blooded mammals on earth produce a fever when infected with a virus, since it prevents the original viral DNA from replicating any copies of itself at all. Thus — the end of the line for the original virus and any viral replication. That is also why most viruses on earth come from birds and reptiles, since they cannot raise their body temperature to cause a fever, and the viruses can run rampant among those animals. Sometimes a viral infections can wipe out and cause complete extinctions among reptiles, amphibians and birds. This is rare among warm-blooded mammals which can create fevers when infected with viruses.

That’s also why we have fevers. And that is why reducing the fever with Nyquil, or Aspirin or other cold and flu medications can kill you when the Viral RNA is allowed to unzip millions of copies of the original single Viral DNA molecule. Each new copy of the original viral DNA can then repeat the process and quickly produce billions of copies of itself in an hour or so, and start infecting more and more of your cells, until it kills you. But the high temperature or a fever will stop the viral replication process instantly.

Where to Look for More Information About Viral Replication – How and Why the CDC Has Misinformed the Public

So Doreen, I would suggest, instead of doing a web search about Viral Replication which doesn’t produce much information — do a web search on “Telomere” or “Telomeres” and find out about the latest research showing how they affect the aging of living cells and how they are sensitive to temperature. Then you will find out about how virus DNA molecules actually replicate. I don’t know of any practicing medical doctors who know much about telomeres and viral replication. It seems only medical researchers in the lab know about that important process.

Thanks for your questions, and I hope I have helped you understand Viral Replication. And yes, it’s pretty much the same way they did it on Star Trek — atom by atom. And even though there may be millions of atoms in the long DNA chain, it is so tiny that the Replication process can be completed in much less than a single second in time. Much faster than you can say “zip.”

Firstly, for those who know me, I always look for the best way to do things while working as little as possible (in the long term) and allow plants to grow naturally as they wish. So I won’t in no way talk about cutting suckers, watering or using any treatment on the plants. I’m simply trying to offer the best environment to the plants, so that they are happy; plants in good health will be plants that bring good results for us as well, it’s as simple as that.

Also one other important information, setting up what I’m describing might take some time, but in the long term it will be much better for us and for the tomato plants; it’s really worth it.

The first and most evident thing is, to have a south exposure as much as possible, to benefit the most from the little amounts of sun we can have in northern regions!

On this schematic, the circle indicates the suns’ position rising in the east and setting in the west. The south exposition must be as good as possible because we’re going to wall off the northern side, we’ll basically plant tomatoes in front of a wall or a big pile of stones. The point is to just have as many stones as possible on the northern side, because these stones will first of all protect the tomatoes from strong winds that most often come from the north or north-west and they will act as a slow diffusion heater, exposed to the sun most of the time, the wall or stones will collect heat and release it slowly when sun is lacking and during the night.

Don’t hesitate to make it tall, a 2 m tall wall is a good size! There is no sun coming from the northern side, so we might as well have as many stones as possible to collect heat. It is also useful to add stones all around the tomatoes, they will all collect/release heat and under the stones, humidity will be retained for longer periods.

The second, and very important point; tomatoes love water but they don’t like being wet! That’s generally the biggest problem in northern regions, excess rain causing blight, which I personally think of as the cold of tomatoes. From my own observations I discovered that the problem is not rain itself, it’s that in the north, when it rains it usually means that a low-pressure system is arriving and temperatures are going to drop, which in turn will prevent the tomato plant leaves from drying up quickly. Whereas in southern regions, when it rains, the temperatures remain the same and the water on the leaves will evaporate almost as quickly as it fell. And that’s the most important aspect to understand, it’s as if a human in the north stayed outside by 30°C under heavy rain and then staying the rest of the day wet because the temperatures dropped to 20°C afterwards, a perfect way to catch a cold. Whereas in southern regions you are otuside, get soaked by a heavy rain, but the temperatures remain as high and one hour later you’re dry again as if nothing happened!

Thus, it is an absolute necessity in northern regions to have a roof on top of your tomato plants! That way, the leaves won’t ever become too wet, with the wall on the northern side you can simply attach the roof at a height of about 2 m. But since we have a lot of rain in the north, we might as well use it well, tomatoes love water, there are two ways to do it easily. If like me you have a chance to put your tomatoes in a place with a heavy clay soil where water is always plentiful 10-20 cm below, you don’t have to do much, just be sure that the bottom of the plant is not soaked in water (by planting it high enough), but making sure that the roots can go deeper by themselves to collect the water they need. If you have a sandy soil, or a soil that dries up quickly, then the best is to put a gutter on the roof to direct rain water straight into the soil aroudn the tomatoes feet.

I said it earlier, in no way are we going to remove the suckers, a name very badly chosen if you want my opinion, because these suckers will grow into branches that will give more tomatoes if the plant is robust, many more tomatoes! The additional leaves will not prevent tomatoes from growing well, on the contrary, these leaves will collect more sunlight to be able to grow more tomatoes at the same time. A tomato plant that grows well and healthy without ever being trimmed can easily produce 10 times more tomatoes than one on which all suckers are removed. Here we have to set up cages, a prop is useless, we have to support the tomato plant from the outside with a grid around it on which all branches will be able to lie instead of attaching the central stem. The easiest method is a round grid cage made with grid of about 2 m length (about 20 x 20 cm mesh), which is rolled on itself, making a grid tube of about 60 cm diameter. A tomato plant growing freely becomes a big bush!

Example, with a wall facing south:

The roof is drawn in brown, the gutter in red, with a drop by drop irrigation system (still with a good flow) to direct rainwater directly around the tomatoes cages when it rains. That’s about it, just put one tomato plant in the middle of each cage and you’re set. In these conditions, tomatoes will have enough heat, they will be protected from the rain and will be naturally watered at their base without making their leaves excessively wet when it rains. You can also (I recommend it) add a big layer of mulch/straw etc. around the tomatoes to keep the soil humid for longer periods when it is dry.

With these cages you can also easily use a method of electroculture by adding a copper pipe as central prop, using the method described in schematic B on this page: Electroculture – Basics

But don’t forget that you shouldn’t connect the grid from the bottom with the grid on top in this case, you just need this grid of galvanised iron mesh around the base, wit ha grid of around 30-40 cm height halfway buried into the ground. Here’s a schematic below to show what I think is the best to do for the cage.

The support poles don’t need to be made of wood, but they must be in a material that is an electrical insulator, hence no metal: wood or plastic is the most practical.

Then, grid 1 is the one used for the electroculture method, I didn’t draw the central copper antenna, but it obviously needs to be there. The grid 1 is in galvanized iron. Then grid 2 is placed a bit higher, not connected to the bottom one and it has a larger mesh (~ 20 x 20 cm), because this is where the tomato branches will have to go past the grid when they grow and use it as support. Then I still recommend to not connect grid 2 to grid 1, and grid 3 to grid 2 etc. for higher up grids. Because there is a small voltage potential difference between the ground and any metallic thing that is higher up in the air not electrically grounded. The higher the grid is, the larger of a voltage difference there is. I’m talking here about differences that can be measured in 0,1 V etc. But for a plant these are huge differences of potentials!

This cage system is useful in any region, not just for northern ones…

The following page is sadly only in french, tomate en cage it provides informations about misconceptions people have about growing tomatoes which are completely wrong!

Here’s a small summary of the most important points:

• Letting suckers grow does not mean that tomatoes will be smaller, if the plant is growing freely there will be many more tomatoes on one plant and all of the same size, if you had cut all the suckers you’d get the same size tomatoes but in a much smaller quantity.
• Tomatoes don’t need to be exposed to the sun to grow, on the contrary it burns them! Leaves need to be exposed to the sun to collect the energy to grow the tomatoes that are protected by the leaves from excessive sunlight.
• Letting suckers grow won’t delay the growth of the first tomatoes, they will grow at the same speed and additional ones will grow on the new branches, once the suckers have developed into full grown branches.

I forgot to specify that this method of growing tomatoes in cages is much more useful for indeterminate varieties (that grow indefinitely) than determinate ones (that stay quite short), on the other hand, the wall and the roof, that’s good for any variety of tomatoes in any northern region!

That’s it folks, it will take a bit of time to set up such an installation, but it’s really worth it in the long term to have nice and healthy tomato plants, that do not require much care and provide us with plenty of tomatoes!

I wanted to add some more technical details, because the original document has a couple of errors; that being said the schematics and setups described are correct, but the explanations are not completely right and incomplete for my taste.

Documents talking about electroculture exist in two versions, there are two types of electroculture, which can both be complementary of each other I believe:

• Coming from the anglophone world: many documents describe a type of electroculture that consists, for the most part, in using high voltages generated by generators (mostly Tesla coils) and which, by various methods are sent into the soil or in the air around the plants to aid their growth.
• From the francophone world: another type of electroculture is described, which here is based on the natural properties of some materials to attract the electrons in the air and in the soil to make them flow better where needed.

These two versions are complementary, in my opinion. But it’s good to know about these differences because when looking around on internet we easily end up on documents talking about electroculture, the same subject, electroculture, but both don’t describe the same methods at all.

The francophone version of electroculture is based on the use of specific materials arranged in specific ways to reap more benefits from a natural property of all materials, i.e. the electronegativity of the elements. Some materials are more electronegative than others, hence by using these various materials properly one can direct the flow of electrons which are naturally collected from the surroundings.

The anglophone version is also very interesting, in all documents I read it’s based on using high voltages generated by Tesla coils, and as explained in other places on this website, Tesla coils are known to be the best orgone generators, they generate currents with very high voltages and very low currents using the principles of resonance. It’s resonance that makes it a great idea, as i explain it somewhere else on this website about my understanding of how orgonite works, orgonite seems to work by an effect of resonance, re-creating electric fields at a pure/perfect frequency. A Tesla coil generates very high voltages at a high frequency, but more importantly of a purity that is almost unmatched, i.e. perfectly regular sinusoidal waves. And as you might already know, I think that these perfectly regular electric fields are most beneficial to all living things; plants, insects, animals, humans and probably for what we consider as inanimate. Plants love classical music, which is also a very clean sound vibration, with perfect harmonics between different notes. Hence I think that plants also love perfect vibrations of any other type, here electric. It is a subject I want to talk about at some point in the future.

Meanwhile, lets get back to electroculture, francophone version, which is based on the electronegativity of all elements that exist on this planet.

Electronegativity is simply the natural tendency that a material has to attract electrons, the higher it is the more the material attracts electrons. That’s what I wanted to correct/explain from the original text from 1978 (Electroculture – Basics), which I noticed while I was re-transcribing it.

Electropositivity does not really exist, it’s a relative measure of electronegativity, i.e. gold has for example an electronegativity of 2.4 (or 2.54 according to other measures), iron has an electronegativity of 1.83, hence compared to gold, iron is electropositive because gold attracts electrons much more than iron does. We can only talk about the electropositivity of a material with regards to another, it makes no sense to talk about an electropositive element on its own… No, we can just say that it is more/less electropositive (or less/more electronegative) compared to another one.

Hence, technically here’s a periodic table, not very precise, with the electronegativity of known elements. Chemistry is good in small doses, and not that hard! However I won’t go into the details about how electronegativity is determined because it becomes much more complicated!

Here you can see that fluorine (F) on the top right is the most electronegative element. We shoudl talk about the electronegativity of alloys and combinations of different elements, because in nature and in our society we often have things that are not pure, like brass which is a mixture of copper and zinc, quartz, which is silicate and oxygen etc. all these combinations also have their own electronegativity, but it becomes much harder to determine. Hence lets stick to pure materials, and those that are of interest for electroculture, which I’ll order by decreasing order of electronegativity:

• Gold (Au): 2.4
• Platinum (Pt): 2.2
• Silver (Ag): 1.93
• Copper (Cu): 1.9
• Iron (Fe): 1.83
• Zinc (Zn): 1.65
• Aluminium (Al): 1.61

That’s enough! Just by looking at those values you can understand why precious metals are so useful in electronic circuits, because not only are they excellent conductors of electricity, but also very electronegative (as far as metals are concerned). However, please do note that a high electronegativity does not mean a high electrical conductivity, Fluorine is the most electronegative element, hence also very reactive, since it attracts electrons very easily it always has a tendency to bond with other elements and hence is not easily available in its pure form in nature. But fluorine is not an electrical conductor, since electrical conductivity depends mostly of the fact that the element has one electron on the outer orbit, or maybe two, but fluorine has seven…

Anyway, lets get back to electroculture. We now have the electronegativity of the most common metals, so we can look in details at the setups of electroculture.Lets look at schematic A which I re-edited for more clarity.

Graphite is a form of carbon, so I used the electronegativity of carbon, 2.55, it might not be 100% accurate, but even if it were 2.3 or 2, it’s clearly more than the electronegativity of zinc, which is 1.65. Hence the carbon electrode attracts more electrons than zinc, which means that the natural flow of electrons will flow in the copper wire, going from the zinc electrode toward the graphite electrode. Here electrons are collected from the infinite pool of electrons which are in the soil! If the electrodes are in contact with the air they will also clearly collect some electrons from the air. What must be also clearly understood, why I added red dotted arrows, is that electrons will also flow through the soil from one electrode toward the other, since the soil is also an electrical conductor (with varying resistance depending on humidity and the minerals in it). This setup is clear, it promotes a good flow of naturally available electrons through the soil and through the air, through the copper wire.

Now let’s look at schematic B, which I also re-edited.

Just before carrying on, when building your setup, always keep an eye on the directions north, south, east, west on the various schematics, on some the north is upward, on some the south is upward..

Here it must be clearly understood that there are two parts, the antenna and the grids. The antenna has a tip in a metal that is less electronegative than the tube. It’s done on purpose, in the original document they explain that we must use iron wire, but zinc is also suitable. The copper tube is the most suitable, because it has an electronegativity of 1,9, which makes it easy to find other metals that are less electronegative for the antenna tip; zinc (1,65), iron (1,83). The tip of the antenna is less electronegative than the tube, hence electrons will naturally flow toward the tube. The purpose of the antenna is to collect electrons from the air. Then you must also remember that in this installation, the antenna is insulated from the soil! It’s very important, there shouldn’t be any electrical conduction between the base of the antenna and the ground. Else like a lightning rod, the excess of electrons will go straight to the ground. This is not what we want, we want to collect the electrons in the air and send them to the galvanised iron mesh first!

You will also notice that when we connect the copper tube with a standard electric cable (in copper) to the galvanised iron mesh in the soil, the copper has an electronegativity of 1,9 and iron only 1,83. Hence you would think that electrons will go from the grid toward the copper tube since it has a higher electronegativity, the copper tube should attract electrons more than the iron mesh… But, it’s not the case, because we shouldn’t forget that electrical currents always want to go to the ground, lightning hits the ground, we insulate our houses with ground rods. It’s a bit of a paradox, earth is as much of a large supplier of electrons as an attractor of electrons. It’s because the ground always attracts electrons, that it’s full of charges.. And anyway, that being said, there are loads of free electrons anywhere around us!

Hence here, the electrons accumulated from the air in the antenna are transferred to the iron grid, because this grid is connected to the soil, thus electrons will naturally want to go in that direction, electronegativity is not a factor of importance for this transfer of energies from antenna to the ground grid. Then we have an antenna that provides electrons to this iron mesh and these electrons arrive in the iron mesh and will diffuse into the soil, the electrons will first go from the antenna through the grid because iron is a better conductor than the soil (it has less resistance). this is where the other opposite mesh will play its role, since it’s once again copper, or any other metal more electronegative than iron, the electrons going through the iron mesh will have a slight tendency to be attracted in the direction of the opposed mesh before dispersing anyway in the end…

From an electrical point of view it’s obvious, electrons always take the path of least resistance; hence they arrive in the iron mesh and then into the ground, but since on another side there is a copper mesh, slightly more electronegative, this will naturally induce a path of slight less resistance in the direction of the copper mesh (because added to the soil resistance there is also the copper attraction..)

Another important point that must be observed is that the meshes should be placed east and west, because we want to leave the north-south path free for the natural magnetic field of the earth.

Now I’m talking from my own understanding of the subject, why must we have the direction of electrons flow from east to west? And not west east? If we take into account the rotation of the planet, if we could leave and object in the air without it being affected by the gravity of the planet, and also not the inertia etc. As the earth rotates, this object would be somewhere else on the planet without having to be moved. By making electrons flow from east to west, the earth rotates in the opposite direction, hence this promotes in a minimal fashion an easier flow for the electrons from east to west instead of the opposite. Also, given the fact that electrons are so light, they are not affected by gravity like normal objects. But it becomes hard to talk about these subjects, because we have go into the topic of relativity..

Furthermore, there is also another interesting aspect that seems to me important to take into account, and electromagnetic wave is composed, as its name indicates, of a magnetic field and an electric field.

A light particle (shown here as the green dot), going to the right, with the electric and magnetic fields shown here above. If we take into account that the natural magnetic fields going north to south and the electric fields going from east to west sort of encourage electromagnetic waves to superpose on these same electric and magnetic fields, we can induce that the installation above helps light particles to go toward the soil. The natural telluric currents and magnetic fields are in these directions anyway. This electroculture setup fosters the penetration of the light into the soil.. If that makes any sense, that’s how I understand it. We shouldn’t forget that what we see is just but a tiny part of the electromagnetic spectrum, many other waves at other frequencies invisible to our eyes can be guided toward the soil, from my point of view cosmic waves are also electromagnetic waves.

Lets go to schematic C, also re-edited.

This setup, instead of promoting the natural flow of electrons, amplifies the strength of the natural magnetic field. Don’t forget while looking at the image, that the needle of a compass pointing to the magnetic north means that  what we consider as the north is in fact a magnetic south pole, it’s a convention that is not always evident, still logical though! This setup does not need to be explained more than that, because here it’s not about the electronegativity of metals, this should more be called magnetoculture… The magnet simply amplifies the natural alignment of electrons inside the iron mesh, which is a ferromagnetic materiel and hence electrons can keep their alignment more or less permanently. Here we can’t use a copper grid or any other non ferromagnetic metal, a ferromagnetic metal is absolutely needed.

Here we amplify the natural magnetic field of the planet while not disturbing the telluric (east-west) currents.

Schematic D now.

This setup is clearly the most simple to put in palce, in a flower pot, around any plant in the garden. But it is in my opinion slightly less efficient than method B or C. Also if we orient setup A correctly, the setup A, I think, is also more efficient than this one.

However, this one is still the easiest and it’s still much better than nothing, it will bring great benefits in any case. The negative point I see here is that the natural flow of electrons in the soil will be multidirectional and hence it’s not on ly in the direction of natural telluric currents. Nonetheless this setup still clearly amplifies the electron flow in the soil and above soil. The antenna is the same as in setup B, with a tip made of a metal that has an inferior electronegativity than the copper tube, thus it attracts electrons from the air, to the tube and to the soil. But here the antenna is directly planted into the soil. Here again we can see it in two parts like, setup B, that are somewhat independent of each other, but still related!

The antenna is directly planted in the ground and hence the electrons collected from the air naturally go to the path of least resistance, the soil. Then the surrounding grid, in galvanised iron mesh, with an electronegativity lower than copper, will, I believe, collect electrons from the soil and also those from the antenna and then again there will be an electron flow going from the mesh to the antenna. And so on the cycle continues, they go back in the antennas, are re-diffused into the soil, partly re-collected by the mesh, etc.

This setup, as I understand, helps naturally collected electrons to flow in a sort of ‘closed loop’ in the same space much longer than they would otherwise without any setup. Which allows the plants to have more time to collect more abundant electrons, which have a tendency to re-circulate in the same place over and over.

Finally there is schematic E, which to me, like to the editors of the Rustica magazine, is the ultimate setup, because here we really play with what’s in nature and the surroundings and nothing else.

The explanation in the article is fully correct, the only thing that is missing to this schematic is that, I think, these compost bands should be oriented east-west, not north-south, south-north; to amplify the natural telluric currents and not disturb earths’ natural magnetic field.

To end the subject, while writing this I thought about a small detail, cosmic waves! from what I learned in astrophysics, this waves can all be considered like light (or electromagnetic waves). Hence, if I’m not wrong with my understanding, the various electroculture setups, allow, by amplifying the natural telluric currents or magnetic field, not only these natural fields to flow more easily but also to let cosmic waves penetrate the soil more easily.

The new green wizards

Leeks as big as the arm of a gardener, strawberries as beautiful as oranges, garlic even four times more beautiful, it’s the giant vegetable garden. The vegetable garden of electroculture, this queen of gardening with miraculous methods.

“A bulb of 800 g! This is nothing says Mr. Thévenin. It might happen once. No, what is needed is not to harvest one but hundreds. You see this square of 25 sqm, with planted garlic, the harvest will surely be of 100 kg instead of 10 compared to traditional methods.”

We were at the end of june when Mr. Thévenin told me that. End of july, at the time of harvest, I went back to see him and he wasn’t lying. The garlic plants lying on the soil sunbathing and drying. They offered bulbs from 900 g to one kilo. 100 kg of garlic on a vegetable garden of 25 sqm, Mr. Thévenin had won his bet. 800 g.. The needle of his scale stabilised and announced 800 g. To the left, in the plate a large weight, to the right in the other plate a bulb of garlic. You read that well! It was clearly a 800 g garlic bulb that Mr. Thévenin had put on his scale. It was big, five times larger than a normal garlic bulb.

Electroculture, the fairy of gardening

The author of these incredible results, this fairy of gardening, this gardening muse is called electroculture.

“So, you know!

- Yes, wires attached to a generator and then we let electrical currents flow through. It’s not natural…

- No, no…”

No, electroculture and electricity providers have nothing in common. Of course it is a matter of current, but it is not produced by a powerplant. It is in the air, in the soil, in us. This free and natural electricity has several aspects:

• The Earth’s magnetic field
  The magnetic field converges to the North Pole. Proof of this is the needle of your compass, it is constantly under its influence and indicates that direction.
• Telluric currents
  These are electric currents flowing through the earth. They move from East to West, but their path varies depending on the arrangement and the layout of terrestrial layers. According to the physicists, their intensity varies according to the months of the year. In June they are at their maximum intensity, and at their minimum in September.
• Cosmic waves
  They come from the stratosphere and penetrate the Earth’s crust.

The aim of electroculture is to pick up the electro-magnetic energies for the benefit of the plants. A vegetable thus grown grows better; its seed germinates faster; the vegetable grows faster; more easily and becomes bigger. The vegetable can also defend itself more easily against illnesses and parasites. It handles more easily periods of drought and rough soils. Indeed, this energetic influx allows the roots to go deeper into the soil to find their food and also reach deeper layers of groundwater that are inaccessible to normally cultivated plants. This energy, is naturally received by all plants: through the roots (that play a role of antennas) which pick up negative electricity from the soil and then frees it through its aerial parts (which also act as antennas). These absorb the positive atmospheric electricity. The exchange of these forces determines the growth of a plant and the proper functioning of the chlorophyll system; briefly said, it organises life thanks to the ascension of sap. Plants cultivated by electroculture hence benefit as much as possible from these energies which, if not picked up, would just be wasted. This is the theory of “electrocultivators”, although some ecologists argue that electroculture  diverts these natural beneficial forces for a whole ensemble for the profit of some privileged plants. I won’t dwell into this debate, but I believe it is necessary to be aware of these two theories. Moreover, it appears that electroculture allows foremost to reveal and produce this healthy energy. As a matter of fact, every single plant is an electrical conductor of a couple of millivolts (experiment made by connecting a voltmeter on a bean plant); in the presence of an electroculture setup the voltages are amplified.

Are you interested by electroculture, are you just discovering it today. You should know that it exists since a very long time. Ancient civilisations, the Egyptians in particular, had noticed that around certain structures or rocks, and depending on orientation, vegetation grew better and was thicker/sturdier. Researchers looked at this phenomenon and found an explanation: some rocks are rich in electropositive metals (like copper), the soil being itself naturally a carrier of negative charges, they thought that at certain locations there was a natural production of forces beneficial to plants.

So, you want to setup such a system in your vegetable garden. There are many setups available. All are prototypes (you should be able to find easily light and simple materials).

In Rustica (the name of this magazine..), we showed a couple of years ago some simple setups (see schematic A).

Nowadays the “Paulin system”, named after its inventor, is the easiest to setup for an amateur. It consists of a painted metallic antenna (plumbing pipe), headed by iron spikes, insulated (porcelain insulation recovered on ‘out of order’ electric lines, or simply a plastic bottle or any non-conducting materials placed at the base of the antenna) and stuck in the ground. A copper wire connects the antenna to a mesh of galvanized iron (standard fences..) with a length of 3 to 4 meters, depending on the parcel to cultivate and of an height of about 20 cm. This mesh is buried a few centimeters deep to facilitate the use of gardening tools. Then 2 – 3 m away, opposite to this first mesh, another mesh of the same size is placed, however this mesh is composed of an electropositive metal, for example copper or brass. It is neither connected to the other mesh, nor to the antenna (Schematic B). The whole setup is oriented so as to allow the passing through of North-South telluric currents.

Another setup (oriented North-South) consists of a straight magnet (do not use horseshoe magnets) placed underground and connected to a grid of galvanised iron placed in parallel. The positive pole (North) of the magnet is directed toward the North (see Schematic C).

For other experiments, you can also use a cage of galvanised iron mesh/grid. Bury it slightly. At the center of this vertical cylinder you plant an antenna made of a copper pipe non connected to the grid at all (Schematic D). Crops sowed or planted on the inside usually have a yield two to three times higher than traditional crops. I saw at Mr. Thévenins’ place, garlics cultivated with such a method were about 10cm taller than neighbouring traditionally cultivated ones.

Wire ‘less’ electroculture

However, the ultimate method of electroculture will in the future consist of getting rid of antennas, wires, etc. How you might ask, can we pick up the energies? By building a “natural cell”: on each side of the field to cultivate we place two bands of compost. One band is acidic (loaded with positive ions) and consisting of heathland, mash-iron, fine sand quarry, rock powder, peat, wood ash, coal dust, soot, chicken manure; the other is alkaline (lacking in positive ions, e.g. negatively charged) and consisting of tuff, limestone soil, lime, masonry plaster, manure. By the principle of communicating vessels, the alkaline body attracts the positive ions of the acidic body. A mini electric current hence results from this exchange and permeates the crops culture. Hereby stimulating the vegetation as it flows through (schematic E).

Gigantic vegetables, increased production, reduced irrigation (50 to 70%) and the economy on manure for an fully organic culture, these are the benefits of electroculture. This gardening technique from the third millennia, though born in antiquity has not finished astonishing us. We look forward to hearing from your experiments.

- Frank Benjamin (Author)

The examples speak
You want to know more about electroculture, write to: C.A.E., 17, rue des Bouvreuils, 33600 Pessac. Near Bordeaux, on an arid terrain, ungrateful, and voluntarily never irrigated, without fertilizer or manure, we cultivated barley. Here are the results:

• harvest on the control plot (no setup): 354g, 149 cobs, average number of grains per cob: 15,
• harvest on the electroculture plot: 795g, 240 cobs, average number of grains per cob: 25.
  At the beginning of our century, lieutenant Basty did experiments with potatoes on two plots of 52m².
• harvest on the control plot: 610kg of potatoes,
• harvest on the electroculture plot: 900kg.

Strawberries (culture with antennas) were harvested on May 19th, other in a traditional culture on the 3rd of June only.
An American, James Lee Scribner obtained, by plunging a bean in electromagnetic baths, a plant of 7m length. He got 72 liters of beans from that giant.
In France, a plant of potatoes cultivated in electroculture attained 2m height and produced more than 4kgs of tubers of prime quality (he received the 1st prize at the National agricultural competition of Versailles in 1977). This plant kept on producing while others (normal culture) were already withered since a long time. In Pithiviers, M.Marcel Thévenin harvested a plant of tomatoes (in a galvanized iron mesh with antenna system) of more than 2m height, loaded with very big and delicious fruits.
In Ruwanda (Africa), drought and hunger prevails. Under the drive of Père Tasse, the villagers using electroculture managed to cultivate tomatoes, mil and sweet potatoes.

Experiments from the 20-02-2013

Experiments done on two colonies of Myrmica sabuleti; test with 10 workers of each colony.

Observations

A couple of seconds after the DECT Phone base was turned on, the workers started moving differently (more slowly, hesitant, even seeming to have some difficulties). They gradually started to move away from just above where the DECT Phone antenna was located and the ones that went in direction to that zone evidently looked like they tried to avoid it (changing direction and even walking backward).

Adding one orgonite (TB) didn’t seem to change much. We then added 5 more orgonites (TBs/ITBs). Soon after, the workers started to move a little bit faster, more easily, less hesitant and some ants were observed even above the zone where the antenna was located. There seemed to be a rather large variability of reaction/behaviour between different ants.

Half an hour after having switched off the DECT, ants moved again as previously, at a normal speed, without hesitation and going easily anywhere and above where the active antenna was previously.

Linear velocity (mm/sec) et angular (deg. ang./cm) (median and quartiles) of the 20 ants, which trajectories were followed under the three experimental conditions.

The values of the linear velocity and angular velocities appropriately describe what happened:

• Lower linear velocity and higher angular velocity with the presence of the powered on DECT Phone
• Intermediate linear velocity and angular velocity (compared to control ones) with the presence of the powered on DECT Phone and 5 adjacent orgonites
• Larger variability of obtained values with DECT and orgonites compared to control values

• Orgonites clearly seem to have an effect, but they don’t remove all the harmful effects cause by the electromagnetic fields generated by the DECT Phone. The ants (except a couple) still detect the presence of the harmful field.
• Humans (not all!) are less sensitive than ants and could hence feel relieved or more at ease with the presence or orgonites. However, these orgonites are (in my opinion) not sufficient enough to overcome the negative effects of zones with a dense coverage; withmany wireless modems in corridors, large numbers of electromagnetic emitters (WiFi etc.) placed in the same room etc.

Videos (In french..)

The study below was prepared by Norwegian researchers. It helps to document some of the extremely negative effects of the ongoing SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) and SRM (solar radiation management) programs. There are now no “organic” sources for food. All has been tainted with the toxic metals and chemicals being emitted by the global spray programs. Some of the toxic elements we are now forced to consume in our food have been identified, others are likely as of yet unknown.

Open Mind Conference, Oslo, October 19th – 21st 2012.

Harald Kautz-Vella:

Theoretical and experimentaly proven negative effects of (Ba, Srx) TiO3 nano particles on plant growth (first draft)

Regarding the chemical & physical (Ba, Srx) TiO3 quality designated as aerosols in global weather engineering concepts

Abstract:

Theoretical implications as well as experimental proof show that (Ba, Srx) TiO3 nano particles < 100 nm as they are discussed as one component for cloud seeding in global weather modification patents would cause harm to plants by

• interrupting cell communication at the 230 nm UV absorption line by absorbing the weak intracellular UV signals responsible to trigger cell division.
• irradiating the plant DNA with high energy ultraviolet light of 230 nm stored as excited states in the Barium/Strontium nuclides. This excitation is caused by exposure to cosmic radiation in clouds. The high-energy photons stored can be released by non-linear optical interaction when a weak longitudinal UV photon of same wave length (Bio-photon) hits a nanoparticle. The excited state oft the nuclides then discharges into a time reversed replica wave precisely flowing back to the DNA exposing it to a UV photon impact of same wave length but much higher energy.
• dis-balancing the cell potential when triggered by terrestrial EMF, microwave or radar-radiation by releasing free electrons during an induced change of crystal geometry following their piezoelectric properties, making the plants vulnerable to the attack of fungi.

The complex interaction of these three theoretically possible forms of damage is not fully understood. However the over all effect on plants could be experimentally confirmed showing a lethal dosis for plants of aprox. 35 mg (Ba, Srx) TiO2 per kg dried organic matter depending on plant type and other external variables (both by lab analysis and) outdoor studies.

Due to the fact that:

• the amount of (Ba, Srx) TiO2 in g per ha and year projected for geo-engeneering purposes is much higher then the experimentally evaluated lethal dosis for plants in g/ha and additionally
• the non-soluability of these crystalls would lead to a continuous accumulation of these particles in the biosphere

launching these projects would be a threat for the biosystems of the world which sooner or later would leed to a total destruction of natural biotopes and agricultural crop in fallout regions.

1. Introduction

The human mind is trained to think in macroskopic sizes, which can lead to wrong decisions when it comes to exposing nature to nano particles. The smaller the particles, the higher the surface/volume ratio becomes. We are technically able to produce (Ba, Srx) TiO3 particles with a surface of 2.500 square meters per gram. For the following estimations this value is going to be used for calculations.

Theoretically an amount of 300 tons of that material would be anough to build a 1 particle thick layer to completely optically cover a country of the size of Germany. To bring out these particles as an aerosol would take 30 flights with a Boing 737 only.

This simple calculation is what is tempting about these materials when it comes to geo-engineering. Whether it is for cloud seeding to controll climate change, or to protect industrial aereas from sun flaires by forming a plasma-shield in the upper atmosphere utilizing the piezoelectric propperties of this material – the benefits can be great. Additionally Barium, the non-radioactive Strontium isotopes 85, 86, 87 and 88 and Titan as well as their oxides can be regarded as chemically non-toxic.

There is irrefutable evidence that non-authorized aerosol spraying has been conducted in the past. Camera footage of spraying military planes, of persistent contrails at temperatures of -35 and a relative humidity of 40%, bear whiteness of people involved up to the former leader of the FBI, and chemical analysis showing the footage of Barium/Strontium Titinate in the chemical analysis of rainwater, soil and plant samples in most of the industrialized countries. However this paper is not to discuss the existance or legitimicy of past action, it is to discuss the effects of future activities as they are currently carried into the public discussion for example by the German ”Umwelt Bundesamt” in the brochure ”Geo-Engeneering. Wirksamer Klimaschutz oder Grössenwahn. Methode. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen. Umweltpolitische Fragen. Berlin, April 2011.”PDF

Not taken into consideration in these public discussions are the optical and electrophysical properties of these materials, which are outstanding, and their possible interaction with bio-systems.

The purpose of this paper is to bring these considerations into debate.

Samples of dying plants or plants which significantly were being slowed down in growth rate from all over the world showed in lab analysis repeatedly high values of Barium, Strontium and Titan in a relative molar concentration that points to 35 mg nano-crystaline Barium/Strontium Titinate per kg dried organic matter at the moment of plant death. Although there is no biochemical explanation for any damage done to the plant the correlation of damage and the Barium, Strontium and Titan concentrations is significant enough to take alternative mechanisms of particle-plant interaction into consideration then the known chemical ones. Knowing that nano particles of the size projected in geo-engineering patents can be absorbed by plants as a hole, and knowing the outstanding properties of these materials, these alternative ways of interaction might be optical and/or electro-physical in nature.

2.Claims

2.1. Optical interruption of cell communication

In the concept of bio-photons the DNA molecules of a plant send out a interfering patterns of bidirectional week UV emissions who are all together forming a holographic picture that acts as a blueprint for the plant, leading to cell divisions at the points where there is no replica wave send back from a receiving DNA-molecule because of a ”missing” cell. The mono-directional and therefore visible wave will trigger cell division in a neighboring cell to close the gap. Complete plants would have their inter-cellular light exchange entirely in the annihilated state of UV waves and their time reversed replica waves, injured plants or growth-active areas like the cambium should show an excess of mono-directional UV waves triggering cell division.

A simplified form of this concept is used in holographic screening technologies using lasers as ”transmitting DNA” and the same type of piezoelectric nano-crystals as ”answering DNA” being able to project high resolution 3D holograms.

The absorption line of Barium/Strontium Titinate nano particles has its maximum at a wave length of 250nm, absorbing 90% of the light passing the crystal/

The intracellular communication that is responsible to trigger cell division is carried out by weak photons of a wave length of 260 nm.

Putting these two findings together shows that inserting piezo-electric particles of this quality should heavily interfere with cell communication – hence the DNA and the particles are using the same wavelength and the same electromagnetic wave form to communicate.

To understand the quantitative relationship between this special type of opacity the nano particles create and the harm done to the plants it is useful to calculate the optical density of the particles in the plant in the moment of their death.

Estimating a concentration of 35 mg/kg dry organic matter like measured in Norwegian loan as well as in the bark of dying Californian trees one can say that

35 mg ≈ 87,5 m2 particle surface ≈ 21,875 m2 optical surface

Estimating that 1 kg dried organic matter equals a volume of 3 l = 0,003 m3 living organic matter opacity will be reached on a optical distance of 0,1311 mm which is in the range of cell size.

In the moment of the plants death, containing 35 mg (Ba, Srx) TiO2, the optical density of the nano-particles is high enough to even interrupt the communication of directly neighboring cells!

2.2. Irradiation of plant DNA with high energy UV light

Understanding the concept of bio-photons as a pattern of bi-directional waves and their time reversed replica waves sent and received by DNA-molecules, involving alien photo-active elements could mean changing the strength of the photons involved from weak to not so weak.

It is known that particles in clouds can be excited by incoming cosmic radiation and later release this radiation in form of gamma rays. This release of gamma rays can happen spontaneously or be triggered by an incoming photon.

Visualizing this possibility it becomes obvious that the involvement of excited nuclides into a bio-photon exchange could lead to a release of stored gamma quants as time reversed replica waves being directly focused back onto the DNA that emitted the triggering bio photon.

This negentropic process redirecting high amounts of energy back onto a weak triggering source actually is the main characteristic of non-linear optical systems. For full understanding please read the referenced articles.

High energy UV radiation is known to be the main source for plant DNA damage. Thus a deposit of optically excited aerosols could lead to DNA damage by released UV quants.

2.3. Disbalancing of cell potential

The immune system of all cells follows a highly defined curve of electromagnetic cell potentials, with defined potential differences between cell-core and the inner membrane surface as well as between the inner and outer cell membrane surface. Any alteration of these cell potentials weakens the ”immune system” by disturbing the equilibrium of oxidant and antioxidant processes.

Barium Strontium Titinate as a piezoelectric substance changes its crystal geometry when exposed to external electromagnetic fields. Any change in crystalographic structure is accompanied by a release of electrons.

As an aerosol in the atmosphere this effect can be used to switch clouds on and off by applying electromagnetic fields as used by HAARP and ICECAT devices or other microwave radiating antenna systems by altering the crystalographic structure which is leading to free current turning the aerosol particle to an ion what instantly leads to the forming of a droplet in the cloud.

The same effect triggered by terrestrial cellphone, microwave or radar transmission would lead to a spontaneous release of free electrons by the particle, which would alter the cell potential and thus destroy or weaken the immune system of the plant.

As a secondary cause the plant might die of fungi infections covering the primary reason of its suffering.

3. Experimental proof

Germination experiments with Barium Strontium Titinate of an engineered domain added in different defined concentrations to the germination process need to be conducted to experimentally evaluate the lethal dosis of Barium Strontium Titinate for plants. I would estimate a concentration of 35 mg/kg soaked seeds as a targeted area of experimentation, adding the Barium Strontium Titinate to the water making sure it is completely absorbed by the seeds.

I would suggest to work on crop seeds like corn, soy beans and wheat, and some fast growing things like cress for quick results to be able to publish a first version.

It should be possible to purchased (Ba, Sr) TiO3 via internet, I saw some offers. If it is impossible to get hold of smaller amounts I suggest to privately contact people working in labs where this substance is used.

4. Conclusion

Although the postulated mechanisms and their interaction is not fully researched there is enough evidence and logic in the matter to NOT use nano particles of the described quality unless the matter is fully researched and damage to plants and nature can be excluded.

Although it is tempting to control the weather to the benefits of the agriculture, although it might appear without alternative to protect our technologies during sun flares that might hit down to the equator during a possible pole shift – especially regarding the exponentially accelerating displacement of the magnetic north pole during the last five years pointing to November 2012 to March 2013 as a possible time of transit – the price might be to high and nature might simply not wake up after a winter of bringing out aerosols – being totally blinded by our attempt to protect.

Dear Ladies and Gentleman

I kindly ask everybody who has access to lab conditions or greenhouses with controlled condition to conduct the missing experiments in chapter 4 and to report the results including pictures to:

kautzvella@gmail.com

tel. 0049 179 2661123

If I should not react on incoming results within a week this text might be used as public domain and completed with your test results naming the lethal doses of Barium Strontium Titinate together with the experimental proof. As long as e-Mail or phone contact to me is given I would like to evaluate the incoming results myself and will publish as soon as there is a visible pattern in the incoming results.

Thank you for your attention and possible contributions.
With best regards,
Harald Kautz-Vella

Source: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/norwegian-study-biological-effects-of-geoengineering-fallout-on-plant-life

Join in the debate on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/resonancebeingsoffrequency

Contact the film makers at james@flatfrogfilms.com

RESONANCE is a sensational eye opening documentary which reveals the harm we are doing by existing in an ocean of man made wireless frequencies.

Two billion years ago life first arrived on this planet; a planet, which was filled with a natural frequency. As life slowly evolved, it did so surrounded by this frequency. and Inevitably, it began tuning in.

By the time mankind arrived on earth an incredible relationship had been struck; a relationship that science is just beginning to comprehend.

Research is showing that being exposed to this frequency is absolutely integral to us. It controls our mental and physical health, it synchronizes our circadian rhythms, and it aids our immune system and improves our sense of wellbeing.

Not only are we surrounded by natural frequencies, our bodies are filled with them too. Our cells communicate using electro magnetic frequencies. Our brain emits a constant stream of frequencies and our DNA delivers instructions, using frequency waves. Without them we couldn’t exist for more than a second.

This delicate balance has taken billions of years to perfect. But over the last 25 years the harmony has been disturbed. and disturbed dramatically.

Mankind has submerged itself in an ocean of artificial frequencies. They are all around us, filling the air and drowning out the earth’s natural resonance.

To the naked eye the planet appears to be the same. But at a cellular level it is the biggest change that life on earth has endured; the affects of which we are just starting to see and feel.